This study aims to analyze news coverage on artificial intelligence (AI) issues and highlight the characteristics and differences in reporting based on media partisanship. By examining AI-related news in the South Korean media, this study reveals how conservative and progressive outlets frame the issue differently. The analysis found that conservative media coverage predominantly focuses on positive aspects, emphasizing development value frames such as the benefits and societal progress brought by AI. In contrast, progressive media often highlight crisis value frames, focusing on issues like side effects, ethical concerns, and legislation surrounding AI. These partisan differences reflect fundamental societal priorities and influence public discourse and policy agendas. Understanding media framing is crucial for fostering informed public dialogue on the societal significance of AI and promoting evidence-based decision-making. By recognizing partisan biases and critically evaluating media coverage, citizens can engage in constructive discourse beyond ideological divides. This study underscores the role of the media in promoting interdisciplinary discussions about the future trajectory of AI and in preparing society for its impacts. Ultimately, evidence-based public discourse is essential for shaping responsible AI policies and mitigating potential risks in the digital age.

中文翻译：

---

媒体的党派之争是否会影响人工智能问题的新闻报道？人工智能问题媒体报道分析


本研究旨在分析有关人工智能（AI）问题的新闻报道，并强调基于媒体党派之争的报道的特征和差异。通过研究韩国媒体中与人工智能相关的新闻，这项研究揭示了保守派和进步派媒体如何以不同的方式看待这个问题。分析发现，保守派媒体报道主要关注积极方面，强调人工智能带来的好处和社会进步等发展价值框架。相比之下，进步媒体经常强调危机价值框架，重点关注人工智能的副作用、道德问题和立法等问题。这些党派差异反映了基本的社会优先事项，并影响公共话语和政策议程。了解媒体框架对于促进有关人工智能社会意义的知情公众对话和促进基于证据的决策至关重要。通过认识到党派偏见并批判性地评估媒体报道，公民可以参与超越意识形态分歧的建设性话语。这项研究强调了媒体在促进有关人工智能未来发展轨迹的跨学科讨论以及让社会做好应对其影响方面的作用。最终，基于证据的公共话语对于制定负责任的人工智能政策和减轻数字时代的潜在风险至关重要。