Under what conditions do originators of innovation benefit from knowledge spillover by learning from knowledge recipients, and when do they not? This study examines how originator firms’ learning from recipients differs depending on their spillover characteristics. These characteristics were captured using the . It also examines how technological alliances moderate the relationship between SKP characteristics and originator follow-on innovations. An analysis of 62 firms over 10 years confirms that while the technological diversity of the SKP has a positive impact on the originator's innovation, the technological overlap of the SKP relative to the originator's knowledge has a negative impact. Furthermore, technological alliances enhance the positive effect of technological diversity while exacerbating the adverse effects of technological overlap. This study contributes to the literature on knowledge spillover, particularly within the knowledge-based view of firms, by providing a balanced perspective that addresses the dual impact of knowledge spillover on originator firms. Furthermore, this research highlights the contingent effects of knowledge spillover by examining the interplay between spillover phenomena and strategic factors, specifically technological alliances. The findings have concrete managerial and policy implications conducive to enhancing firms’ innovation performance in the context of knowledge spillover.

中文翻译：

---

知识溢出与发起者创新绩效：技术联盟的调节作用


在什么条件下，创新发起者可以通过向知识接受者学习而从知识溢出中受益，什么时候不能？本研究探讨了发起企业从接收者那里学习的情况如何根据其溢出特征而有所不同。这些特征是使用 .它还研究了技术联盟如何调节 SKP 特征与发起者后续创新之间的关系。对 62 家公司 10 年来的分析证实，虽然 SKP 的技术多样性对原创者的创新有积极影响，但 SKP 相对于原创者知识的技术重叠会产生负面影响。此外，技术联盟增强了技术多样性的积极影响，同时加剧了技术重叠的不利影响。这项研究通过提供平衡的视角来解决知识溢出对创始企业的双重影响，为有关知识溢出的文献做出了贡献，特别是在基于知识的企业观点中。此外，本研究通过研究溢出现象与战略因素（特别是技术联盟）之间的相互作用，强调了知识溢出的偶然影响。研究结果具有具体的管理和政策意义，有利于在知识溢出的背景下提高企业的创新绩效。