Recovering from work is essential for maintaining occupational well-being, health, motivation, and performance, but recovery is often difficult to achieve. In this study, we evaluated and compared the effectiveness of two (parallel) interventions aimed at promoting recovery: one based on mindfulness and one involving applying cognitive-behavioral strategies. Both interventions were embedded in a measurement burst design, which allowed us to examine the mechanisms underlying change or intervention success. To explore mechanisms of change, we used the stressor-detachment model as a theoretical framework. We operationalized the interventions' effects in three ways: as changes from pretest to posttest, as changes in daily states, and as changes in daily associations. To this end, we used intensive longitudinal data to examine the roles that daily negative activation plays in detachment and strain. In a randomized controlled trial (N = 393), we administered three assessments of traits: pretest, posttest (8 weeks later), and follow-up (3 months after the posttest). We also administered 2 work weeks of experience sampling questionnaires (preintervention and postintervention). Latent change models and Bayes factor equivalence tests revealed that both interventions substantially-and to a similar extent-increased detachment. Bayesian multilevel path models showed improvements in all state variables, including improvements in negative activation, and provided some evidence that mindfulness-based and cognitive-behavioral approaches might tackle different processes at the daily level. We discuss theoretical implications for the literature on recovery from work and specifically for the stressor-detachment model. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

心理疏离的正念和认知行为策略：比较有效性和改变机制。


从工作中恢复对于维持职业福祉、健康、动力和绩效至关重要，但恢复往往很难实现。在这项研究中，我们评估并比较了两种旨在促进康复的（平行）干预措施的有效性：一种基于正念，另一种涉及应用认知行为策略。这两种干预措施都嵌入到测量突发设计中，这使我们能够检查变革或干预成功的潜在机制。为了探索变化的机制，我们使用压力源-脱离模型作为理论框架。我们通过三种方式来实施干预措施的效果：从前测到后测的变化、日常状态的变化以及日常关联的变化。为此，我们使用密集的纵向数据来研究日常负激活在脱离和应变中所扮演的角色。在一项随机对照试验 (N = 393) 中，我们对特征进行了三项评估：前测、后测（8 周后）和随访（后测后 3 个月）。我们还进行了为期 2 个工作周的经验抽样调查问卷（干预前和干预后）。潜在变化模型和贝叶斯因子等价测试表明，两种干预措施都显着（并且在相似程度上）增加了脱离。贝叶斯多级路径模型显示了所有状态变量的改善，包括消极激活的改善，并提供了一些证据，表明基于正念和认知行为的方法可能会处理日常水平的不同过程。我们讨论了有关从工作中恢复的文献的理论意义，特别是压力源-脱离模型的理论意义。 （PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2024 APA，保留所有权利）。