当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Occupational Health Psychology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Investigating daily abusive supervision as antecedent of subordinates' low psychological detachment and relaxation during nonwork time: A diary study.
Journal of Occupational Health Psychology ( IF 5.9 ) Pub Date : 2024-06-24 , DOI: 10.1037/ocp0000377
Julia Iser-Potempa 1 , Hadar Nesher Shoshan 2 , Sabine Sonnentag 1
Affiliation  

Recovery from work is highly relevant for employees, yet understanding the interpersonal antecedents of impaired recovery experiences remains unclear. Specifically, because former research neglected supervisor behaviors as a predictor of impaired recovery and abusive supervision is a core stressor, we examine daily abusive supervision as a predictor of subordinates' recovery experiences (i.e., psychological detachment and relaxation). We draw on research on the recovery paradox and propose that psychological detachment and relaxation will be impaired on days with high abusive supervision, although recovery would have been highly important on those days. We suggest a cognitive mechanism (via rumination) and an affective mechanism (via anger) to explain this paradox. We test coworker reappraisal support as a moderator that buffers the adverse effects of abusive supervision on rumination and anger. In a daily diary study (171 subordinates, 786 days), we found an indirect effect of abusive supervision on psychological detachment via rumination and indirect effects of abusive supervision on psychological detachment and relaxation via anger. Coworker reappraisal support moderated the association of abusive supervision and rumination, such that the relationship was weaker when coworker support was high. Our results suggest that including negative supervisor behaviors, such as abusive supervision, in recovery research is highly relevant. Coworkers can help cognitively process abusive-supervision experiences by providing reappraisal support. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译:


调查日常虐待监督是下属在非工作时间心理疏离和放松程度较低的先决条件:一项日记研究。



工作中的康复与员工高度相关,但对康复经历受损的人际因​​素的理解仍不清楚。具体来说,由于以前的研究忽视了主管行为作为恢复受损的预测因子,而虐待性监督是核心压力源,因此我们将日常虐待性监督作为下属恢复经历(即心理疏离和放松)的预测因子。我们利用对恢复悖论的研究,提出在高度虐待监督的日子里,心理疏离和放松会受到损害,尽管在那些日子里恢复非常重要。我们建议用认知机制(通过沉思)和情感机制(通过愤怒)来解释这个悖论。我们测试同事的重新评估支持作为调节剂,以缓冲虐待性监督对沉思和愤怒的不利影响。在一项每日日记研究中(171 名下属,786 天),我们发现虐待监督通过沉思对心理疏离产生间接影响,以及虐待监督通过愤怒对心理疏离和放松产生间接影响。同事重新评估支持调节了虐待监督和沉思的关联,因此当同事支持较高时,这种关系较弱。我们的结果表明,将负面主管行为(例如虐待性监管)纳入康复研究中是高度相关的。同事可以通过提供重新评估支持来帮助认知地处理虐待性监督经历。 (PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
更新日期:2024-06-24
down
wechat
bug