当前位置: X-MOL 学术American Psychologist › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The manifestation of health equity tourism in psychological science and research.
American Psychologist ( IF 12.3 ) Pub Date : 2024-01-01 , DOI: 10.1037/amp0001254
Lorraine T Benuto 1 , Ana J Bridges 2
Affiliation  

Health equity tourism (HET) represents yet another example of how structural racism may manifest in our discipline. While not a new phenomenon, HET was coined recently in the context of medicine and is defined as investigators without the requisite experience or commitment to health equity work "parachuting into the field in response to timely and often temporary increases in public interest and resources" (Lett et al., 2022, p. 2). To determine how HET manifests in psychological science, we interviewed 18 health equity experts. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results revealed that HET manifests as a passing interest in health equity research, minimal engagement with communities under study or with health equity experts, and a failure to appreciate health equity scholarship as a specialty area of psychological science. Consequences of HET include poor quality research, harm to communities under study, funneling of resources away from health equity experts, frustration with and disengagement from the field and academia (leading to slow career advancements and attrition), and a maintenance of structural racism in psychological science. We provide recommendations for preventing the further manifestation of HET in psychology and for reducing the associated harms. These recommendations include education and training regarding the construct of HET, engagement in reflective practice, and a reconsideration of how research with minoritized populations is approached and evaluated. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译:


健康公平旅游在心理科学研究中的体现



健康公平旅游(HET)代表了结构性种族主义如何在我们的学科中表现出来的另一个例子。虽然 HET 不是一个新现象,但它是最近在医学背景下创造的,被定义为没有必要经验或对健康公平工作承诺的调查人员“为了应对公共利益和资源的及时且通常是暂时的增加而跳伞到该领域”(莱特等人,2022 年,第 2 页)。为了确定 HET 在心理科学中的表现,我们采访了 18 位健康公平专家。使用反思性主题分析对数据进行分析。结果显示,HET 表现为对健康公平研究一时兴趣,与所研究的社区或健康公平专家的接触很少,并且未能将健康公平奖学金视为心理科学的专业领域。 HET 的后果包括研究质量差、对研究中的社区造成伤害、健康公平专家的资源流失、对现场和学术界的挫败感和脱离(导致职业发展缓慢和人员流失),以及在心理领域维持结构性种族主义。科学。我们提供预防 HET 在心理学中进一步表现并减少相关危害的建议。这些建议包括关于构建 HET 的教育和培训、参与反思实践以及重新考虑如何进行和评估少数群体研究。 (PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
更新日期:2024-01-01
down
wechat
bug