This meta-analysis examines the association between exposure to community violence and parenting behaviors (i.e., positive parenting, harsh/neglectful parenting, parent-child relationship quality, and behavior control). A systematic search yielded 437 articles that measured community violence exposure before or at the time of parenting, assessed parenting, and were available in English. There were 342 effect sizes across parenting constructs: positive (k = 101; 68 studies), harsh/neglectful (k = 95; 60 studies), relationship quality (k = 68; 41 studies), and behavior control (k = 78; 51 studies), from 160 reports representing 147 distinct studies. Results of the three-level meta-analyses found small but significant effects between community violence and positive parenting (r = -.059, 95% CI [-.086, -.032]; 95% PI [-.268, .151]), harsh/neglectful parenting (r = .133, 95% CI [.100, .166]; 95% PI [-.107, .372]), parent-child relationship quality (r = -.106, 95% CI [-.145, -.067]; 95% PI [-.394, .182]), and behavior control (r = -.047, 95% CI [-.089, -.005]; 95% PI [-.331, .237]). The association between exposure to community violence and harsh/neglectful parenting and behavior control was moderated by the type of exposure to community violence, informant or source of community violence and parenting data, child age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Given the substantial degree of heterogeneity in overall effect sizes, implications for policy and intervention are tentatively considered while emphasizing that more empirical research on the association between community violence and parenting is essential for advancing the field. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

接触社区暴力和养育行为：荟萃分析综述。


这项荟萃分析研究了社区暴力暴露与养育行为（即积极养育、严厉/疏忽养育、亲子关系质量和行为控制）之间的关联。系统搜索产生了 437 篇文章，这些文章测量了育儿之前或育儿期间的社区暴力暴露情况，评估了育儿方式，并且有英文版本。育儿结构有 342 个效应大小：积极（k = 101；68 项研究）、严厉/疏忽（k = 95；60 项研究）、关系质量（k = 68；41 项研究）和行为控制（k = 78；60 项研究）。 51 项研究），来自代表 147 项不同研究的 160 份报告。三级荟萃分析的结果发现，社区暴力和积极养育之间存在微小但显着的影响（r = -.059，95% CI [-.086，-.032]；95% PI [-.268，.151 ])、严厉/疏忽的养育方式 (r = .133, 95% CI [.100, .166]; 95% PI [-.107, .372])、亲子关系质量 (r = -.106, 95 % CI [-.145, -.067]；95% PI [-.394, .182]）和行为控制（r = -.047，95% CI [-.089，-.005]；95% PI [-.331, .237])。接触社区暴力与严厉/疏忽的养育和行为控制之间的关联受到社区暴力的类型、社区暴力的线人或来源以及养育数据、儿童年龄、性别和种族/民族的调节。鉴于总体效应大小存在很大程度的异质性，我们暂时考虑对政策和干预的影响，同时强调对社区暴力与育儿之间的关联进行更多的实证研究对于推进该领域至关重要。 （PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2024 APA，保留所有权利）。