Reports an error in "Defining racial allies: A qualitative investigation of White allyship from the perspective of people of color" by Cassandra L. Hinger, Cirleen DeBlaere, Rebecca Gwira, Michelle Aiello, Arash Punjwani, Laura Cobourne, Ngoc Tran, Madison Lord, Jordan Mike and Carlton Green (Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2023[Nov], Vol 70[6], 631-644). An additional citation was added for the structure of the definition of White allies in the second paragraph of the introduction. The online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2024-23216-002.) While interdisciplinary scholars and activists urge White allies to engage in racial justice work led by the voices of Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC), to date, most research on racial allyship has centered exclusively on the perspective of White allies themselves. Thus, the purpose of this study was to create a framework of racial allyship from the perspective of BIPOC. Utilizing constructivist grounded theory (Charmaz, 2014), focus groups were conducted to understand how BIPOC describe the knowledge, skills, and actions of White allies. Participants across eight focus groups described allyship as an ongoing interpersonal process that included a lifelong commitment to (a) building trust, (b) engaging in antiracist action, (c) critical awareness, (d) sociopolitical knowledge, (e) accountability, and (f) communicating and disseminating information. The findings of this study point to several avenues through which White counseling psychologists can incorporate racial allyship in their research, training, clinical, and advocacy work that align with our field's emphasis on social justice, multiculturalism, and prevention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

对 Hinger 等人的“定义种族盟友：从有色人种的角度对白人盟友关系进行定性调查”的更正。 （2023）。


报告 Cassandra L. Hinger、Cirleen DeBlaere、Rebecca Gwira、Michelle Aiello、Arash Punjwani、Laura Cobourne、Ngoc Tran、Madison Lord 所著的“定义种族盟友：从有色人种角度对白人盟友关系进行定性调查”中的错误Jordan Mike 和 Carlton Green（咨询心理学杂志，2023 年[11 月]，第 70 卷[6]，631-644）。在引言的第二段中添加了对白人盟友定义结构的额外引用。本文的网络版本已更正。 （以下原文摘要出现在记录 2024-23216-002 中。）虽然跨学科学者和活动家敦促白人盟友参与由黑人、原住民和有色人种 (BIPOC) 的声音领导的种族正义工作，迄今为止，大多数关于种族盟友关系的研究都完全集中在白人盟友本身的观点上。因此，本研究的目的是从 BIPOC 的角度创建一个种族联盟的框架。利用建构主义扎根理论（Charmaz，2014），进行焦点小组研究，以了解 BIPOC 如何描述白人盟友的知识、技能和行动。八个焦点小组的参与者将盟友关系描述为一个持续的人际交往过程，包括终身致力于 (a) 建立信任、(b) 参与反种族主义行动、(c) 批判意识、(d) 社会政治知识、(e) 问责制和(f) 沟通和传播信息。这项研究的结果指出了白人咨询心理学家可以将种族联盟纳入他们的研究、培训、临床和宣传工作中的几种途径，这些途径与我们领域对社会正义、多元文化主义和预防的强调相一致。 （PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2024 APA，保留所有权利）。