In their recent Viewpoint article, Beidas et al. (2023) argue that researchers should test psychosocial interventions in the contexts in which they are meant to be delivered and that they can accelerate the deployment of these interventions by advancing directly from pilot trials to effectiveness and implementation studies without conducting efficacy trials. In this commentary, we argue that this is a well-intended but problematic approach and that there is a more productive strategy for translational behavioral intervention research. The commentary discusses issues concerning intervention development, refinement, and optimization; pilot and efficacy testing of interventions; the contexts in which interventions are delivered; clinical practice guidelines; and quick versus programmatic answers to significant clinical research questions. Testing psychosocial interventions in the contexts in which they are meant to be delivered is a complex task for interventions that are designed to be used in a wide variety of contexts. Nevertheless, interventions can be tested in the contexts in which they are meant to be delivered without sacrificing programmatic intervention development or safety and efficacy testing. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

在情境中测试心理社会干预措施：Beidas 等人的评论。 （2023）。


Beidas 等人在最近的观点文章中。 （2023）认为，研究人员应该在预期实施的背景下测试心理社会干预措施，并且他们可以通过直接从试点试验推进到有效性和实施研究而不进行有效性试验来加速这些干预措施的部署。在这篇评论中，我们认为这是一种用意良好但存在问题的方法，并且对于转化行为干预研究存在更有效的策略。评论讨论了有关干预措施开发、细化和优化的问题；干预措施的试点和功效测试；实施干预措施的背景；临床实践指南；对重要临床研究问题的快速解答和程序化解答。对于旨在在各种背景下使用的干预措施来说，在预期实施的背景下测试心理社会干预措施是一项复杂的任务。尽管如此，干预措施可以在预期实施的环境中进行测试，而不会牺牲程序性干预措施的开发或安全性和有效性测试。 （PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2024 APA，保留所有权利）。