当前位置: X-MOL 学术Sports Med. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Impact of Sedentary Behaviors on Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Disease: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
Sports Medicine ( IF 9.3 ) Pub Date : 2024-08-20 , DOI: 10.1007/s40279-024-02099-w
Myles W O'Brien 1, 2, 3 , Madeline E Shivgulam 3 , Angélica Huerta Domínguez 4 , Haoxuan Liu 5 , Jocelyn Waghorn 6 , Molly Courish 6 , Jorge Tovar-Díaz 4
Affiliation  

Background

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are among the leading causes of mortality in the western world, and high blood pressure is among the greatest risk factors for CVD. Given that most of a person's waking hours are spent in sedentary behaviors, understanding the cardiovascular impact of a sedentary lifestyle is imperative. Although limiting sedentary time is encouraged in public health messaging, individual reviews analyzing its impact on clinically relevant cardiovascular outcomes such as blood pressure and CVD exhibit conflicting results.

Objective

We conducted an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses synthesizing the effects of sedentary time/behaviors on blood pressure or CVD.

Methods

To be included, studies had to be a systematic review and/or meta-analysis that studied the impact of sedentary time or a sedentary posture on blood pressure or CVD incidence/mortality. The review was preregistered in PROSPERO (CRD4202342568) and conducted in May 2023. The Joanna Briggs Institute and Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews tools assessed study quality. PRISMA reporting was followed.

Results

Our umbrella review screened 2215 citations with 40 review studies meeting our inclusion criteria (n = 22 meta-analyses) that included 234 unique individual studies of 3,769,755 unique participants. The average study quality was high (9.2 ± 1.7 out of 11). A minority of studies (n = 7/20) supported that less sedentary time was associated with lower blood pressure, with reviews of interventional studies typically not observing a consistent effect (n = 9/12), whereas reviews of cross-sectional studies observed a positive effect (n = 5/7). When hypertension rates were used as the outcome, most (n = 3/4) studies observed a deleterious impact of sedentary time. For CVD incidence/mortality, less sedentary time or screen time was consistently associated with a lower CVD incidence/mortality (n = 17/23), with studies exhibiting a null effect generally including small sample sizes and being of a lower study quality. Total sedentary time and specific behaviors (i.e., television and screen time) exhibited similar findings.

Conclusions

Based on a high quality of evidence and large sample size, existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses demonstrate the negative impact of sedentary behaviors on CVD incidence/mortality, with conflicting reports for blood pressure that vary based on the study design.



中文翻译:


久坐行为对血压和心血管疾病的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析的总括性评价


 背景


心血管疾病 (CVD) 是西方世界导致死亡的主要原因之一,高血压是 CVD 的最大危险因素之一。鉴于一个人醒着的大部分时间都花在久坐不动的行为上,因此了解久坐不动的生活方式对心血管的影响是必不可少的。尽管公共卫生信息鼓励限制久坐时间,但分析其对临床相关心血管结果(如血压和 CVD)影响的个别评论显示出相互矛盾的结果。

 目的


我们对综合久坐时间/行为对血压或 CVD 影响的系统评价和荟萃分析进行了伞式评价。

 方法


要纳入,研究必须是系统评价和/或荟萃分析,研究久坐时间或久坐姿势对血压或 CVD 发病率/死亡率的影响。该综述已在 PROSPERO (CRD4202342568) 进行了预注册,并于 2023 年 5 月进行。Joanna Briggs Institute 和Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews工具评估了研究质量。遵循 PRISMA 报告。

 结果


我们的伞式综述筛选了 2215 篇引文,其中 40 项综述研究符合我们的纳入标准(n = 22 项荟萃分析),其中包括 234 项独特的个体研究,涉及 3,769,755 名独特的参与者。平均研究质量很高 (9.2 ± 1.7 分(满分 11 分)。少数研究 (n = 7/20) 支持久坐时间较短与血压降低相关,干预研究的评价通常没有观察到一致的效果 (n = 9/12),而横断面研究的评价观察到积极影响 (n = 5/7)。当高血压发生率作为结局时,大多数 (n = 3/4) 研究观察到久坐时间的有害影响。对于 CVD 发病率/死亡率,久坐时间或屏幕时间较少始终与较低的 CVD 发病率/死亡率相关 (n = 17/23),表现出零效应的研究通常包括样本量小且研究质量较低。总久坐时间和特定行为 (即电视和屏幕时间) 表现出类似的发现。

 结论


基于高质量的证据和大样本量,现有的系统评价和荟萃分析证明了久坐行为对 CVD 发病率/死亡率的负面影响,根据研究设计的不同,血压报告相互矛盾。

更新日期:2024-08-20
down
wechat
bug