In this invited commentary, I address what I see as the major contributions Rubenstein et al. (2024) have made to challenging the hegemony of exposure therapies for trauma-exposed persons. These include a thorough review of the history of the rise of exposure therapies, the identification of posttrauma responses as forms of anxiety disorders, and an extensive discussion of the neurobiology of the trauma response. Additionally, Rubenstein et al. expose the very high dropout rates in studies of exposure therapies and ways in which many traumatized people have not found them helpful. This article brings the so-called "gold standard" back to its rightful position as one possible, occasionally helpful way of assisting some, but not all, traumatized people. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

耳目一新，必要地暴露创伤暴露疗法的问题：鲁宾斯坦等人的评论。 （2024）。


在这篇特邀评论中，我阐述了鲁宾斯坦等人的主要贡献。 (2024) 致力于挑战针对遭受创伤的人的暴露疗法的霸权。其中包括对暴露疗法兴起历史的彻底回顾，将创伤后反应识别为焦虑症的形式，以及对创伤反应的神经生物学的广泛讨论。此外，鲁宾斯坦等人。暴露疗法研究中暴露了非常高的辍学率，以及许多受创伤的人发现这些疗法没有帮助的方式。本文将所谓的“黄金标准”带回到其应有的地位，作为一种可能的、偶尔有用的方式来帮助一些但不是全部受创伤的人。 （PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2024 APA，保留所有权利）。