PURPOSE Children with developmental language disorder frequently have difficulty with both academic success and language learning and use. This clinical focus article describes core principles derived from a larger program of research (National Science Foundation 1748298) on language intervention combined with science instruction for preschoolers. It serves as an illustration of a model for integrating language intervention with curricular content delivery. METHOD We present a five-step model for a speech-language pathologist and other school professionals to follow to (a) understand the grade-level core curriculum objectives; (b) align intervention targets with the curriculum; (c) select a therapy approach that aligns with both goals and curricular content, and (d) methods for implementing the intervention; and (e) verify that both the intervention and the curriculum have been provided in accordance with best practices. We apply this model to the Next Generation Science Standards, a science curriculum popular in the United States, and to grammar and vocabulary interventions, two areas of difficulty for children with developmental language disorders, though it would be possible to extend the steps to other curricular areas and intervention targets. CONCLUSIONS We conclude by discussing the barriers and benefits to adopting this model. We recognize that both speech-language pathologists and teachers may have limited time to implement language intervention within a general education curriculum, but we suggest that the long-term benefits outweigh the barriers.

中文翻译：

---

我们必须谈论一些事情：为什么不谈论课程？在课程内容中嵌入语言干预的指南。


目的 患有发育性语言障碍的儿童经常在学业成功以及语言学习和使用方面遇到困难。这篇临床焦点文章描述了源自一项更大的研究计划（国家科学基金会 1748298）的核心原则，该研究计划将语言干预与学龄前儿童的科学教学相结合。它作为将语言干预与课程内容交付相结合的模型的例证。方法 我们提出了一个五步模型，供言语病理学家和其他学校专业人员遵循，以（a）了解年级核心课程目标； (b) 使干预目标与课程保持一致； (c) 选择与目标和课程内容相一致的治疗方法，以及 (d) 实施干预的方法； (e) 验证干预措施和课程是否按照最佳实践提供。我们将此模型应用于下一代科学标准（一种在美国流行的科学课程）以及语法和词汇干预（对于患有发展性语言障碍的儿童来说这是两个困难领域），尽管可以将这些步骤扩展到其他课程领域和干预目标。结论 我们通过讨论采用该模型的障碍和好处来得出结论。我们认识到，言语病理学家和教师在普通教育课程中实施语言干预的时间可能有限，但我们认为长期利益大于障碍。