当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Anaesthesia
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Risk of bias and problematic trials: characterising the research integrity of trials submitted to Anaesthesia
Anaesthesia ( IF 7.5 ) Pub Date : 2024-08-15 , DOI: 10.1111/anae.16411 Paul Bramley 1, 2 , Joshua Hulman 1 , Helen Wanstall 3
Anaesthesia ( IF 7.5 ) Pub Date : 2024-08-15 , DOI: 10.1111/anae.16411 Paul Bramley 1, 2 , Joshua Hulman 1 , Helen Wanstall 3
Affiliation
There is some evidence for systematic biases and failures of research integrity in the anaesthesia literature. However, the features of problematic trials and effect of editorial selection on these issues have not been well quantified.
中文翻译:
偏倚风险和有问题的试验:描述提交给麻醉的试验的研究完整性
有一些证据表明麻醉文献中存在系统性偏倚和研究诚信失败。然而,有问题的试验的特点和编辑选择对这些问题的影响尚未得到很好的量化。
更新日期:2024-08-15
中文翻译:
偏倚风险和有问题的试验:描述提交给麻醉的试验的研究完整性
有一些证据表明麻醉文献中存在系统性偏倚和研究诚信失败。然而,有问题的试验的特点和编辑选择对这些问题的影响尚未得到很好的量化。