Compare physician gestalt to existing screening tools for identifying sepsis in the initial minutes of presentation when time-sensitive treatments must be initiated. This prospective observational study conducted with consecutive encounter sampling took place in the emergency department (ED) of an academic, urban, safety net hospital between September 2020 and May 2022. The study population included ED patients who were critically ill, excluding traumas, transfers, and self-evident diagnoses. Emergency physician gestalt was measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 to 100 at 15 and 60 minutes after patient arrival. The primary outcome was an explicit sepsis hospital discharge diagnosis. Clinical data were recorded for up to 3 hours to compare Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), quick SOFA (qSOFA), Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), and a logistic regression machine learning model using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) for variable selection. The screening tools were compared using receiver operating characteristic analysis and area under the curve calculation (AUC). A total of 2,484 patient-physician encounters involving 59 attending physicians were analyzed. Two hundred seventy-five patients (11%) received an explicit sepsis discharge diagnosis. When limited to available data at 15 minutes, initial VAS (AUC 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88, 0.92) outperformed all tools including LASSO (0.84; 95% CI 0.82 to 0.87), qSOFA (0.67; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.71), SIRS (0.67; 95% 0.64 to 0.70), SOFA (0.67; 95% CI 0.63 to 0.70), and MEWS (0.66; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.69). Expanding to data available at 60 minutes did not meaningfully change results. Among adults presenting to an ED with an undifferentiated critical illness, physician gestalt in the first 15 minutes of the encounter outperformed other screening methods in identifying sepsis.

中文翻译：

---

早期医生格式塔与常用筛查工具预测危重急诊患者脓毒症的比较


将医生格式塔与现有筛查工具进行比较，以便在必须开始时间敏感的治疗时在就诊的最初几分钟内识别脓毒症。这项前瞻性观察性研究于 2020 年 9 月至 2022 年 5 月在一家学术型、城市安全网医院的急诊科 (ED) 进行了连续接触抽样。研究人群包括病情危重的 ED 患者，不包括外伤、转院、和不言而喻的诊断。急诊医师格式塔在患者到达后 15 分钟和 60 分钟时使用视觉模拟量表 (VAS) 进行测量，范围为 0 至 100。主要结局是明确的脓毒症出院诊断。记录长达 3 小时的临床数据，以比较全身炎症反应综合征 (SIRS)、序贯器官衰竭评估 (SOFA)、快速 SOFA (qSOFA)、改良早期预警评分 (MEWS) 和使用 Least 的逻辑回归机器学习模型用于变量选择的绝对收缩和选择算子 (LASSO)。使用受试者工作特征分析和曲线下面积计算 (AUC) 来比较筛选工具。总共分析了 2,484 次医患会面，涉及 59 名主治医生。 275 名患者 (11%) 接受了明确的败血症出院诊断。当仅限于 15 分钟的可用数据时，初始 VAS（AUC 0.90；95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.88, 0.92）优于所有工具，包括 LASSO（0.84；95% CI 0.82 至 0.87）、qSOFA（0.67；95% CI 0.64）至 0.71）、SIRS（0.67；95% CI 0.64 至 0.70）、SOFA（0.67；95% CI 0.63 至 0.70）和 MEWS（0.66；95% CI 0.64 至 0.69）。扩展到 60 分钟时可用的数据并没有显着改变结果。 在患有未分化危重疾病而到急诊室就诊的成年人中，医生在就诊的前 15 分钟内完成的检查在识别脓毒症方面优于其他筛查方法。