Stephenson, T., Hudiburg, T., Mathias, J. M., Jones, M., & Lynch, L. M. (2024). Do Tasmanian devil declines impact ecosystem function? Global Change Biology, 30, e17413. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17413.
It has come to our attention that the legends for Figure 3 were incorrect.
FIGURE 3
Open in figure viewerPowerPoint
Relative abundance of all bacterial phyla (a–c) and phyla whose abundance significantly differed between treatment and control (d–f). Colors indicate life strategy or ecosystem function: Green (e.g., Acidobacteria) = K-selected, mauve (e.g., Planctomycetota) = anaerobic ammonium oxidizers, blue (e.g., Proteobacteria, Bacteroidota) = r-selected. Significant differences between treatment and control locations are indicated by stars after phylum name in legend (*p < .05*, **p < .01, ***p < .001). The relative abundance of K-selected and ammonium oxidizing phyla declined significantly under latrine treatments; r-selected phyla increased in relative abundance compared to control.
The correct figure is:
This error does not change the results or conclusions of the article.
所有细菌门的相对丰度（a-c）以及处理和对照之间丰度显着差异的门（d-f）。颜色表示生命策略或生态系统功能：绿色（例如，酸杆菌）= K-选择，紫红色（例如，浮霉菌）= 厌氧铵氧化剂，蓝色（例如，变形菌，拟杆菌）= r-选择。处理位置和对照位置之间的显着差异用图例中门名称后的星号表示（* p < .05*，** p < .01，*** p < .001）。在厕所处理下，钾选择门和氨氧化门的相对丰度显着下降；与对照相比，r选择的门的相对丰度增加。
京公网安备 11010802027423号