Self-injurious thoughts and behaviours (SITBs) are a leading cause of death, and interpersonal processes (IPs) appear to play a role in SITBs. This systematic review synthesises the literature on IPs and SITBs in daily life and addresses four critical questions: (1) Which IPs have been assessed and how, (2) How are differences in IPs individuals associated with SITBs?, (3) How are differences in IPs individuals associated with SITBs? and (4) Do IPs relate differently to self-injurious thoughts than behaviours? Our review followed PRISMA guidelines and eligible literature was screened until 25 April 2024. We identified 58 Experience Sampling studies (32.76% daily-diary studies) of which most focused on IPs from major SITBs theories (e.g., thwarted belongingness) but largely used inconsistent operationalizations. Results from 39 studies investigating within-person associations were mixed. Based on 26 studies, whether differences in IPs between individuals relate to SITBs remains unclear. Three studies have investigated whether IPs relate to the transition from thoughts to behaviours, but temporal models are needed to draw firm conclusions. Studies investigating IPs and SITBs in daily life are largely inconclusive. Psychometrically validated measures are warranted, and future daily-life studies would benefit from drawing on ideation-to-action frameworks.

中文翻译：

---

对自伤思想和行为的经验抽样研究中的人际过程及其测量进行系统回顾


自残想法和行为 (SITB) 是导致死亡的主要原因，而人际交往过程 (IP) 似乎在 SITB 中发挥着重要作用。本系统综述综合了有关日常生活中的 IP 和 SITB 的文献，并解决了四个关键问题：(1) 哪些 IP 已被评估以及如何评估，(2) IP 个体之间的差异与 SITB 有何关联？(3) 差异如何？与 SITB 相关的 IP 个人？ (4) 知识产权与自残想法的关系与与行为的关系是否不同？我们的审查遵循 PRISMA 指南，筛选合格文献直至 2024 年 4 月 25 日。我们确定了 58 项经验抽样研究（32.76% 每日日记研究），其中最关注主要 SITB 理论中的知识产权（例如，受挫的归属感），但主要使用不一致的操作化。 39 项调查人际关联的研究结果好坏参半。基于 26 项研究，个体之间的 IP 差异是否与 SITB 有关仍不清楚。三项研究调查了知识产权是否与从思想到行为的转变有关，但需要时间模型才能得出确切的结论。调查日常生活中的 IP 和 SITB 的研究基本上没有结论。经过心理测量验证的措施是必要的，未来的日常生活研究将受益于借鉴从想法到行动的框架。