当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Family Theory & Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
A guide to conducting intersectional phenomenological research in family science
Journal of Family Theory & Review ( IF 3.2 ) Pub Date : 2024-08-02 , DOI: 10.1111/jftr.12580
Jaclyn Elisa Keenoy 1 , Romi Paldi 2 , Yasmine Perry 2 , Melissa Screven 2 , Brad van Eeden‐Moorefield 2
Affiliation  

An increasing number of scholars suggest the need to enhance the incorporation of diversity and social justice across all areas of family science. Part of this work has seen family science more strongly and explicitly incorporate intersectional theorizing to problematize individual biases and power positions, generally, and of researchers and participants, more specifically. More work is needed to connect theory, method, and methodology to advance the call of scholars. Here, we attend to this call by providing methodological considerations for conducting intersectional phenomenological research in family science. We begin with an overview of phenomenology, including its philosophical and methodological foundations and variations. We then introduce the history of intersectionality, followed by critical methodological considerations for intersectional phenomenological research in family science. This integration of intersectionality and phenomenological research centers the lived experiences of individuals and families with historically marginalized identities while attending to power dynamics often part of scholarship.

中文翻译:


家庭科学交叉现象学研究指南



越来越多的学者认为有必要在家庭科学的所有领域加强多样性和社会正义的融合。这项工作的一部分是家庭科学更强烈、更明确地纳入交叉理论,以解决一般性的个人偏见和权力地位问题,更具体地说,解决研究人员和参与者的偏见和权力地位问题。需要做更多的工作来连接理论、方法和方法论,以推进学者的呼吁。在这里,我们通过提供在家庭科学中进行交叉现象学研究的方法论考虑来响应这一号召。我们首先概述现象学,包括其哲学和方法论基础及其变化。然后,我们介绍交叉性的历史,然后是家庭科学交叉现象学研究的关键方法论考虑。这种交叉性和现象学研究的整合集中于历史上边缘化身份的个人和家庭的生活经历,同时关注权力动态通常是学术的一部分。
更新日期:2024-08-02
down
wechat
bug