当前位置: X-MOL 学术The Accounting Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
How Do Online Conflict Disclosures Support Enforcement? Evidence from Personal Financial Disclosures and Public Corruption
The Accounting Review ( IF 4.4 ) Pub Date : 2024-01-12 , DOI: 10.2308/tar-2021-0402
Alexandra A. Scherf 1
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT Public corruption is a concern for democracies around the world. In the U.S., states have responded to this issue by publishing personal financial disclosures (PFDs) for public officials online. PFDs are a conflict-of-interest disclosure designed to relieve agency conflicts between private citizens and government officials by documenting overlaps between officials’ financial interests and public responsibilities. This paper explores whether and how online PFD supports anticorruption enforcement. I present a stylized model illustrating how online PFD leads investigators to increase case referral volume and quality. Empirically, I find that online PFD for local officials is associated with increased referral rates and greater likelihoods of prosecution conditional on referral. I conduct 126 field interviews of federal prosecutors, journalists, and ethics commissions to understand the mechanisms behind these results. I conclude that online PFD supports the enforcement of local corruption by reducing disclosure acquisition costs for enforcement agents.

中文翻译:


在线冲突披露如何支持执法?个人财务披露和公共腐败的证据



摘要公共腐败是世界各地民主国家所关注的问题。在美国,各州已通过在线发布公职人员个人财务披露(PFD)来应对这一问题。 PFD 是一种利益冲突披露,旨在通过记录官员的经济利益和公共责任之间的重叠来缓解私人公民和政府官员之间的机构冲突。本文探讨了在线 PFD 是否以及如何支持反腐败执法。我提出了一个程式化模型,说明在线 PFD 如何引导调查人员提高案件转介数量和质量。根据经验,我发现地方官员的在线 PFD 与转介率的提高以及转介条件下起诉的可能性增加有关。我对联邦检察官、记者和道德委员会进行了 126 次实地采访,以了解这些结果背后的机制。我的结论是,在线 PFD 通过降低执法人员的披露获取成本来支持当地腐败的执法。
更新日期:2024-01-12
down
wechat
bug