Resilience is traditionally seen as the capability to bounce back to normal from undesired change, while sustainability transitions research seeks to understand how a radical change can be promoted. This may be seen as a puzzle, not least considering the increasingly frequent combination of both sets of concepts in policy and scholarly approaches. In this article we systematically review scientific publications that combine these concepts. The findings highlight that resilience is an emerging analytical lens, owing especially to perspectives developed within socio-ecological resilience thinking. This internalizes “nature” more explicitly into conceptual and empirical work, not least regarding energy systems. Future research may be related to issues like stability and change and capabilities for various forms of change, but also needs to pay attention to trade-offs emerging from assumptions about normative resilience, and undesirable resilience which may exist or emerge in different phases and places in transitions.

中文翻译：

---

可持续转型研究中的复原力视角：系统文献综述


传统上，复原力被视为从不良变化中恢复正常的能力，而可持续性转型研究则旨在了解如何促进彻底的变革。这可能被视为一个谜题，尤其是考虑到政策和学术方法中两组概念越来越频繁的结合。在本文中，我们系统地回顾了结合这些概念的科学出版物。研究结果强调，复原力是一个新兴的分析视角，特别是由于社会生态复原力思维中发展的观点。这将“自然”更明确地内化到概念和实证工作中，尤其是在能源系统方面。未来的研究可能涉及稳定性和变化以及各种形式变化的能力等问题，但也需要关注规范弹性假设中出现的权衡，以及在不同阶段和地点可能存在或出现的不良弹性。过渡。