The paper replies to three issues that Fedlman raises in his assessment research since the 1991 National Institute of Mental Health Social Work Task Force Report. Three topics are addressed, the need to expand and better prepare the social work research workforce, the profession's current research infrastructure, and improving research- to-practice research translation. Ideas for workforce growth include attracting more students with articulation of social work's social justice and research missions, increasing doctoral education rigor, and peer review of doctoral education programs as a tool for program improvement. The Group for the Advancement of Doctoral Education has contributed to research education progress with its program standards, but not all programs meet these standards. Research to practice can be aided by the creation of AI-based tools. The profession needs better data on research productivity and infrastructure in research-intensive schools in order to raise needed resources for research.

中文翻译：

---

继续前进：回复费尔德曼


该论文回应了 Fedlman 自 1991 年国家心理健康研究所社会工作工作组报告以来在评估研究中提出的三个问题。讨论了三个主题：扩大和更好地准备社会工作研究队伍的需要、该专业当前的研究基础设施以及改进研究到实践的研究转化。劳动力增长的想法包括通过阐明社会工作的社会正义和研究使命来吸引更多的学生，提高博士教育的严谨性，以及将博士教育项目的同行评审作为项目改进的工具。博士教育促进小组通过其项目标准为研究教育的进步做出了贡献，但并非所有项目都符合这些标准。基于人工智能的工具的创建可以帮助研究到实践。该行业需要有关研究密集型学校的研究生产力和基础设施的更好数据，以便筹集研究所需的资源。