Replications provide credibility by demonstrating under what conditions experimental findings can be repeated, the premise behind evidence-based practices. Replications in single-case research also investigate generalization of findings across groups. For groups with high variability, such as individuals with autism, assumptions of generalizability should be based on learners who are similar in critical ways. The purpose of this study was to use Coyne et al.'s framework for replication and the next generation guidelines for single-case research to extend understanding of “for whom” and “under what conditions” modified schema-based instruction (an established evidence-based practice for individuals with autism) is effective. In this distal conceptual replication of Root et al., contextual and instructional variables of theoretical and practical importance were intentionally manipulated or maintained and reported to model transparency and support replicability. Four high school students receiving special education under the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act category of autism were taught mathematical and social problem-solving behaviors within the context of percentage-of-change word problems. Researchers used modified schema-based instruction and augmented reality in a one-on-one setting and assessed generalization to purchasing in the food court of a mall biweekly. We frame our discussion around the recommendations for replication research from Coyne et al. and recommendations for single-case research from Ledford et al., concluding with suggestions for future replications that use single-case research designs.

中文翻译：

---

MSBI“对谁”和“在什么条件下”有效？对患有自闭症的高中生的概念复制


复制通过证明在什么条件下可以重复实验结果来提供可信度，这是循证实践背后的前提。单案例研究的重复也调查了跨群体研究结果的普遍性。对于具有高变异性的群体，例如患有自闭症的个体，普遍性的假设应该基于在关键方面相似的学习者。本研究的目的是利用 Coyne 等人的复制框架和下一代单案例研究指南来扩展对“为谁”和“在什么条件下”修改的基于图式的教学（已建立的证据）的理解。以自闭症患者为基础的练习）是有效的。在 Root 等人的远端概念复制中，有意操纵或维护并报告具有理论和实践重要性的背景和教学变量，以建立模型透明度并支持可复制性。四名根据《残疾人教育法》自闭症类别接受特殊教育的高中生在变化百分比应用题的背景下学习数学和社会问题解决行为。研究人员在一对一的环境中使用修改后的基于图式的指导和增强现实，并每两周评估一次在购物中心美食广场购物的概括性。我们围绕 Coyne 等人的复制研究建议进行讨论。 Ledford 等人对单案例研究的建议，最后对使用单案例研究设计的未来复制提出了建议。