Given that practicing teleanalytically is relatively new and more widespread than ever, questions about how to practice and teach it effectively have increased and are more pressing than ever. To contribute answers to these questions, this paper addresses long-standing and persisting negative views of teleanalysis as an inherently muted, remote, and pale experience with reduced therapeutic effectiveness. I propose that this view of teleanalysis as inherently inferior to in-office analysis limits or even precludes its therapeutic usefulness because it allows analysts to avoid making analytic use of the disturbing feelings hiding within the experience of practicing teleanalysis. Through case examples, I suggest that when analysts do not take our negative views of teleanalysis at face value but instead consider them as symbolic expressions of our and our patients’ anxieties, we can improve our understanding of our analytic functioning within the tele-setting and enhance our capacity to think and engage analytically effectively in any setting. I maintain that these considerations have important implications, not only for how experienced analysts practice, but also for how we treat and teach future analysts.

中文翻译：

---

远程分析不必“静音”：论分析师内部框架在任何环境中的关键作用


鉴于远程分析练习相对较新且比以往任何时候都更加广泛，因此有关如何有效练习和教授远程分析的问题已经增加，并且比以往任何时候都更加紧迫。为了回答这些问题，本文阐述了长期以来对远程分析的负面看法，认为远程分析本质上是一种静音、遥远和苍白的体验，会降低治疗效果。我认为，这种远程分析本质上不如办公室分析的观点限制甚至排除了其治疗作用，因为它允许分析师避免分析使用隐藏在远程分析实践经验中的令人不安的感觉。通过案例，我建议，当分析师不要从表面上接受我们对远程分析的负面看法，而是将其视为我们和患者焦虑的象征性表达时，我们可以提高我们对远程分析功能的理解，并且增强我们在任何环境下有效思考和分析的能力。我认为这些考虑因素不仅对经验丰富的分析师如何实践，而且对我们如何对待和教导未来的分析师都有重要影响。