Assessment of soft and hard tissue changes following micro crestal flap—Alveolar ridge preservation and augmentation at molar extraction sites in patients with stage III/IV periodontitis: A randomized controlled trial,Journal of Clinical Periodontology

当前位置： X-MOL 学术 › J. Clin. Periodontol. › 论文详情

Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)

Assessment of soft and hard tissue changes following micro crestal flap—Alveolar ridge preservation and augmentation at molar extraction sites in patients with stage III/IV periodontitis: A randomized controlled trial
Journal of Clinical Periodontology ( IF 5.8 ) Pub Date : 2024-07-24 , DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.14045
Haoyun Zhang ₁ , Tao Xu ₂ , Yiping Wei ₁ , Ning Wei ₁ , Ziyao Han ₁ , Wenjie Hu ₁

Affiliation

AimThis study aimed to assess hard and soft tissue contour changes following micro crestal flap‐alveolar ridge preservation (MCF‐ARP) and natural healing (NH) in periodontally compromised molar extraction sites and to analyse the feasibility and need for bone augmentation during implant therapy.Materials and MethodsFifty‐six patients with 70 sites were randomized into two groups at the site level (35 sites from 31 patients in the test group and 35 sites from 29 patients in the control group). Among whom, four patients contributed one tooth to the control group and one tooth to the test group. Hard tissue indicators were measured using cone beam computed tomography performed before tooth extraction and 6 months after surgery. Soft tissue contour changes were assessed using intraoral scanning performed before and immediately after surgery and also 2 weeks and 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery.ResultsSix months after surgery, the MCF‐ARP group showed less resorption in buccal bone height (p = .032) and greater augmentation in central bone height (p = .001) and ridge width (p = .009). The mean, vertical and horizontal collapse of buccal soft tissue contour in the MCF‐ARP group were 0.95 mm (p = .010), 0.61 mm (p = .019) and 0.56 mm (p = .013) less than that in the NH group, respectively. There were significantly (p = .007) fewer sites in the MCF‐ARP group than in the NH group (0% vs. 26.7%) for staged bone augmentation and more sites that could be treated with simple implant procedure in the MCF‐ARP group than in the NH group (71.9% vs. 56.6%).ConclusionsCompared with NH, MCF‐ARP reduced bone resorption in periodontally compromised molar extraction sites and maintained the buccal soft tissue contour. MCF‐ARP reduces the need for complex bone augmentation procedures in implant therapy. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Register (ChiCTR) ChiCTR2200056335. Registered on 4 February 2022, Version 1.0.

更新日期：2024-07-24

点击分享查看原文

点击收藏

阅读更多本刊新发论文本刊介绍/投稿指南