Capdevila P, Stott I, Cant J, Beger M, Rowlands G, Grace M, Salguero-Gómez R. (2022) Life history mediates the trade-offs among different components of demographic resilience. Ecology Letters, 25(6), 1566–1579. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.14004

The authors note a mistake in the calculation of resistance in the methods section, which alters the interpretation of some of the results. In the manuscript, we applied a correction to calculation of resistance (${\underset{\_}{\rho }}_1$) in Equation (3) by subtracting the first step attenuation from 1 (1 − ${\underset{\_}{\rho }}_1$). Such subtraction in the formula was an error, and the correct calculation should simply be ${\underset{\_}{\rho }}_1$ where values close to 1 correspond to high resistance and 0 to low resistance.

In Figure 2 of the original manuscript, we showed that the phylogenetic signal for resistance was 0.48 ± 0.26 (mean ± SE) in animals and 0.02 ± 0.04 in plants. When applying the correct calculation of resistance the phylogenetic signal remains virtually unaltered, with values of 0.45 ± 0.25 and 0.03 ± 0.04, respectively.

In Figure 3 of the original manuscript, we showed that resistance and recovery time were positively associated in animals and slightly, negatively associated in plants. Also, resistance and compensation were positively associated in animals and plants. When applying the correct calculation of resistance, the same associations hold, but the correlation values are inverted. That is, resistance and recovery time are negatively correlated in animals (Figure 3a) and positively correlated in plants (Figure 3d), while resistance and compensation are negatively correlated for both animals (Figure 3d) and plants (Figure 3e).

In Figure 4 of the original version of our paper, we showed that resistance was negatively associated with generation time in animals, while it was positively associated in plants. We also showed that resistance was positively associated with reproductive output for both plants and animals. When applying the correct calculation of resistance, we again show that the associations hold, but naturally they are reversed (Figure 4). Resistance is positively associated with generation time in animals and negatively associated in plants (Figure 4b), and resistance is negatively associated with reproductive output in both plants and animals (Figure 4e).

In the original supplementary analyses, we showed that most of the correlations among the life history traits and the resilience components were not spurious. When applying the correct calculation of resistance, there are still discrepancies between the simulated and the natural populations in their association of resistance with life history traits. The only difference is that the relationships with resistance are inverted (Figure S1).

In the original supplementary analyses, we showed resistance was independent of body dimension for both animals and plants, with the slopes of these correlations showing no clear trend. This pattern holds for the updated version of the plot but with the resistance axis reversed (Figure S2b,e).

In Figure S3 of the original supplementary materials, we showed that resistance did not have any clear association with the Raunkiær life forms. The updated version shows the same patterns, but with the resistance axes reversed (Figure S3, middle panel).

In Figure S4 of the original supplementary materials, we showed that there was a high variation in the compensation, resistance and recovery time among the different conservation statuses of the species (Figure S4). These results remain unaltered, but the resistance axes are reversed (Figure S4, middle panels).

Capdevila P, Stott I, Cant J, Beger M, Rowlands G, Grace M, Salguero-Gómez R. (2022) 生活史调节人口弹性不同组成部分之间的权衡。生态学快报，25(6)，1566–1579。 https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.14004

作者注意到方法部分中阻力计算中的一个错误，这改变了对某些结果的解释。在手稿中，我们通过从 1 (1 − ${\underset{\_}{\rho }}_1$ ) 中减去第一步衰减，对公式 (3) 中的电阻 ( ${\underset{\_}{\rho }}_1$ ) 计算进行了修正。公式中的这种减法是错误的，正确的计算应该是 ${\underset{\_}{\rho }}_1$ ，其中接近1的值对应于高电阻，0对应于低电阻。

在原始手稿的图 2 中，我们表明动物中的抗性系统发育信号为 0.48±±0.26（平均值±±SE），植物中的系统发育信号为 0.02±±0.04。当应用正确的抗性计算时，系统发育信号实际上保持不变，其值分别为 0.45±0.25 和 0.03±0.04。

在原始手稿的图 3 中，我们表明，动物的抵抗力和恢复时间呈正相关，而植物的抵抗力和恢复时间呈轻微负相关。此外，动物和植物的抵抗力和补偿呈正相关。当应用正确的电阻计算时，相同的关联成立，但相关值相反。也就是说，阻力和恢复时间在动物中呈负相关（图 3a），在植物中呈正相关（图 3d），而阻力和补偿时间在动物（图 3d）和植物（图 3e）中均呈负相关。

在我们论文原始版本的图 4 中，我们表明动物的抗性与世代时间呈负相关，而在植物中则呈正相关。我们还表明，抗性与植物和动物的繁殖产量呈正相关。当应用正确的阻力计算时，我们再次证明这些关联成立，但它们自然是相反的（图 4）。在动物中，抗性与世代时间呈正相关；在植物中，抗性与世代时间呈负相关（图 4b）；而在植物和动物中，抗性与繁殖产量呈负相关（图 4e）。

在最初的补充分析中，我们表明生活史特征和弹性成分之间的大多数相关性并不是虚假的。当应用正确的抗性计算时，模拟群体和自然群体之间的抗性与生活史特征的关联仍然存在差异。唯一的区别是与电阻的关系是相反的（图 S1）。

在最初的补充分析中，我们表明动物和植物的抗性与身体尺寸无关，这些相关性的斜率没有显示出明显的趋势。该模式适用于该图的更新版本，但阻力轴相反（图 S2b、e）。

在原始补充材料的图 S3 中，我们表明耐药性与 Raunkiær 生命形式没有任何明确的关联。更新后的版本显示了相同的模式，但阻力轴相反（图 S3，中图）。

在原始补充材料的图S4中，我们表明，不同保护状态的物种之间的补偿、抵抗和恢复时间存在很大差异（图S4）。这些结果保持不变，但阻力轴颠倒了（图 S4，中图）。