ObjectiveTest whether global self‐reports of urgency moderated the within‐person associations of affect and impulsive behaviors.BackgroundNegative urgency is a personality trait that is a risk factor for a range of psychopathology. Although it is assumed that global self‐reports of urgency measure individual tendencies to act more impulsively in the face of negative emotions, evidence from ecological momentary assessment studies is mixed.MethodIn this Registered Report, we used ecological momentary assessment data from a large sample of young adults (n = 496, age 18–22, 5 surveys per day for 40 days).ResultsAll forms of momentary impulsivity were impaired in moments when people reported more intense negative emotions, but global self‐reports of urgency did not explain individual differences in this association. Moreover, averaged affective states, rather than specific dimensions, affective circumplex, or appraisals, best predicted impulsive states.ConclusionsResults suggest that face‐valid interpretations of global self‐report of urgency are inaccurate, and it may be important to understand how some people come to understand themselves as high on urgency rather than assuming that people's self‐reports of their motivations are accurate. Momentary experiences of emotions globally impact multiple weakly to moderately associated impulsive behaviors, and future research should seek to understand both when and for whom these associations are strongest.

中文翻译：

---

作为国家级流程的负紧迫性


目的测试总体的紧迫感自我报告是否调节了情感和冲动行为的人内关联。背景负紧迫感是一种人格特质，是一系列精神病理学的危险因素。尽管假设全球紧迫性自我报告衡量了个体在面对负面情绪时更冲动行事的倾向，但生态瞬时评估研究的证据是混杂的。方法在这份注册报告中，我们使用了来自大样本的生态瞬时评估数据。年轻人（ n = 496，年龄 18-22，每天 5 次调查，持续 40 天）。结果当人们报告更强烈的负面情绪时，所有形式的瞬时冲动都会受到损害，但总体的紧迫性自我报告并不能解释这种关联中的个体差异。此外，平均情感状态，而不是具体维度、情感循环或评估，最能预测冲动状态。结论结果表明，对全球自我报告的紧迫性的面部有效解释是不准确的，了解有些人是如何来的可能很重要了解自己的紧迫性，而不是假设人们对自己动机的自我报告是准确的。情绪的瞬间体验会在全球范围内影响多种弱到中度关联的冲动行为，未来的研究应该寻求了解这些关联何时以及对谁而言最强。