To the Editor,

We have read with great interest the clinical study by Dong-gon et al. published in Critical Care [1]. The study showed a robust correlation between higher PaO₂ (≥ 80 mmHg) during the first three ICU days and a lower 28-day mortality. The optimal PaO₂ range represents an intriguing and significant subject for exploration.

Our department is the general Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of a tertiary teaching hospital, with sepsis-related patients making up approximately one-fourth to one-third of the total patient population. We are deeply interested in exploring the issue of "optimal oxygenation". Therefore, we conducted a statistical analysis of patients admitted to our department with sepsis.

We retrospectively examined adult patients who admitted to ICU with sepsis as the primary diagnosis. Data were collected from consecutive electronic health records of Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University between January 2021 and December 2023. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) aged ≥ 18 years; (2) The primary diagnosis was related to sepsis; (3) the length of ICU stay ≥ 3 days. The exclusion criteria included a lack of data on PaO₂ during the first three days of ICU admission due to missing information, less than three days of ICU stay, or readmission or the presence of severe concurrent organ failures (e.g., myocardial infarction, uremia, advanced malignant tumor).

We also defined ICU day 1 as the time from ICU admission to the first midnight, ICU day 2 as the next 24 h from the first midnight, and ICU day 3 as the time from the second midnight to the third midnight. The values of PaO₂ over the first three days of ICU admission were collected. When multiple arterial blood gas analysis was performed, the lowest result regarding PaO₂ was recorded. Based on the PaO₂ value from arterial blood gas analysis, patients who maintained a PaO₂ ≥ 80 mmHg during the first three days in the ICU were assigned to the liberal PaO₂ group, while the remaining were included in the conservative PaO₂ group.

We used univariate logistic regression analysis to examine the association between the PaO₂ and the clinical outcomes (ICU mortality, in-hospital mortality and invasive ventilation). This analysis provided odds ratios and 95% CIs. Two-sided P values < 0.05 were considered significant. All analysis were performed using SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 24.0.

During the study period, 489 adult patients admitted to the ICU were screened, after 197 patients were excluded from the analysis (94 patients had an ICU stay of less than 3 days, 10 patients were readmitted, 93 patients had severe concurrent organ failures), ultimately 292 patients were included in the final analysis (Fig. 1).

Flow chart

Full size image

The total in-hospital mortality rate and ICU mortality for our study population were 35.3% (n = 103) and 32.5% (n = 95). In-hospital mortality and ICU mortality were significantly different between the conservative PaO₂ group and the liberal PaO₂ group. The liberal PaO₂ group showed a significantly higher probability of survival (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.32–0.88, for in-hospital mortality; OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.29–0.83, for ICU mortality). There was no statistical difference in invasive ventilation between the two groups (Table 1).

Our findings are consistent with Dong-gon’s [1], indicating that real-world data can support the results of their results. This finding is of great significance. Sepsis is at a high risk of morbidity and mortality, imposing a significant global economic burden. Currently, in line with various guidelines and those specific to COVID-19 [2, 3], it is recommended to maintain SpO₂ levels below 100%. This is because exposure to hyperoxemia may cause oxidative damage, inflammation, and increase alveolar-capillary permeability [4,5,6,7,8]. The results of this study are poised to shift the perspectives of ICU doctors, benefiting a larger population of sepsis patients.

Certainly, obtaining more reliable results requires high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for confirmation. It is acknowledged that patients in extremely critical conditions may not reach a PaO₂ level of at least 80 mmHg, resulting in increased mortality rates. Further research is essential to mitigate the influence of this scenario. Moreover, additional studies are needed to establish the optimal cutoff value for liberty PaO₂ and to address inquiries concerning the duration of maintaining elevated PaO₂ levels, all of which warrant further investigation.

In summary, according to the study’s data and our findings, we suggest, that sepsis patients was given higher PaO₂(PaO₂ ≥ 80 mmHg) for the first 3 ICU days. Overall oxygenation target for sepsis patients should be subject to further investigations.

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

ICU:

Intensive care unit

PaO₂ :

Partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood

OR:

Odds ratio

CI:

Confidence interval

COVID-19:

Corona virus disease-2019

RCTs:

Randomized controlled trials

1. Hyun DG, Ahn JH, Huh JW, Hong SB, Koh Y, Oh DK, Lee SY, Park MH, Lim CM. The association of arterial partial oxygen pressure with mortality in critically ill sepsis patients: a nationwide observational cohort study. Crit Care. 2024;28(1):187.

   Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

2. Siemieniuk RAC, Chu DK, Kim LH, et al. Oxygen therapy for acutely ill medical patients: a clinical practice guideline. BMJ. 2018;363: k4169.

   Article PubMed Google Scholar

3. Piraino T, Madden M, Roberts KJ, et al. AARC Clinical practice guideline: management of adult patients with oxygen in the acute care setting. Respir Care. 2022;67(1):115–28.

   Article PubMed Google Scholar

4. Panwar R, Hardie M, Bellomo R, et al. Conservative versus liberal oxygenation targets for mechanically ventilated patients. a pilot multicenter randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;193(1):43–51.

   Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

5. Girardis M, Busani S, Damiani E, et al. Effect of conservative vs conventional oxygen therapy on mortality among patients in an intensive care unit: the oxygen-ICU randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;316(15):1583–9.

   Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

6. Mackle D, Bellomo R, Bailey M, Beasley R, Deane A, Eastwood G, Finfer S, Freebairn R, King V, Linke N, Litton E. ICU-ROX investigators the Australian and New Zealand intensive care society clinical trials group Conservative oxygen therapy during mechanical ventilation in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(11):989–98.

   Article PubMed Google Scholar

7. Schjørring OL, Klitgaard TL, Perner A, et al. Lower or higher oxygenation targets for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(14):1301–11.

   Article PubMed Google Scholar

8. Asfar P, Schortgen F, Boisramé-Helms J, Charpentier J, Guérot E, Meg- arbane B, et al. Hyperoxia and hypertonic saline in patients with septic shock (HYPERS2S): a two-by-two factorial, multicentre, randomised, clinical trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2017;5:180–90.

   Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

None.

Authors and Affiliations

1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, 82 North 2nd Section of 2nd Ring Road, Jinniu District, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China

   Liyuan Peng, Xiaoming Qin & Lvlin Chen

1. Liyuan PengView author publications

   You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

2. Xiaoming QinView author publications

   You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

3. Lvlin ChenView author publications

   You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

LP and XQ wrote the main manuscript text and LP prepared table and figure. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lvlin Chen.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable. Ethics approval is currently undergoing the review process at the Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

Cite this article

Peng, L., Qin, X. & Chen, L. Hyperoxemia may be more beneficial for patients with sepsis. Crit Care 28, 252 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05017-8

Download citation

• Received: 25 June 2024

• Accepted: 04 July 2024

• Published: 19 July 2024

• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05017-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative