当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Journal of Vocational Behavior
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Interests of the future: An integrative review and research agenda for an automated world of work
Journal of Vocational Behavior ( IF 5.2 ) Pub Date : 2024-06-24 , DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2024.104012 Alexis Hanna , Christopher D. Nye , Andrew Samo , Chu Chu , Kevin A. Hoff , James Rounds , Frederick L. Oswald
Journal of Vocational Behavior ( IF 5.2 ) Pub Date : 2024-06-24 , DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2024.104012 Alexis Hanna , Christopher D. Nye , Andrew Samo , Chu Chu , Kevin A. Hoff , James Rounds , Frederick L. Oswald
Research on automation and the future of work is a major focus for both academics and practitioners due to technological changes disrupting the labor market and educational pathways. Although recent articles have published projections about the types of tasks and jobs most likely to be automated in the coming years, little attention has been devoted to how different types of vocational interests are susceptible to automation, as well as resulting changes to the match between people's interests and their jobs. In the present article, we provide an integrative review of vocational interests and automation projections within and across jobs. By standardizing and mapping projections to Holland's RIASEC interest model, we found that Investigative (scientific) and Conventional (detail-oriented) interests, including STEM interests, are most susceptible to automation, whereas Social (people-oriented) and Realistic (hands-on) interests are least susceptible. For Artistic and Enterprising interests, some creative work, decision-making, and leadership skills may be affected by automation across a range of jobs. We build on these projections to propose a future research agenda integrating interests, technology, and careers. Specifically, we identify five areas for future research, including using intentional work design to enhance interests, the role of interests in career decisions related to project-based work, changes in people's interests following automation, increased use of basic interests, and the systematic impacts of automation on different groups of people. Overall, this review highlights how vocational interests will remain an important topic with high relevance for career guidance, education, and organizations as the future of work evolves.
中文翻译:
未来的兴趣:自动化工作世界的综合审查和研究议程
由于技术变革扰乱了劳动力市场和教育途径,对自动化和未来工作的研究成为学者和从业者的主要关注点。尽管最近的文章发表了关于未来几年最有可能实现自动化的任务和工作类型的预测,但很少有人关注不同类型的职业兴趣如何容易受到自动化的影响,以及由此导致的人们之间的匹配的变化。兴趣和他们的工作。在本文中,我们对工作内部和跨工作的职业兴趣和自动化预测进行了综合审查。通过将预测标准化并映射到 Holland 的 RIASEC 兴趣模型,我们发现调查性(科学)和传统(注重细节)兴趣,包括 STEM 兴趣,最容易受到自动化的影响,而社会性(以人为本)和现实性(实践性)兴趣)利益最不受影响。对于艺术和企业兴趣来说,一些创造性工作、决策和领导技能可能会受到一系列工作自动化的影响。我们以这些预测为基础,提出一个整合兴趣、技术和职业的未来研究议程。具体来说,我们确定了未来研究的五个领域,包括利用有意的工作设计来增强兴趣、兴趣在与基于项目的工作相关的职业决策中的作用、自动化后人们兴趣的变化、基本兴趣的使用增加以及系统性影响自动化对不同人群的影响。总的来说,这篇评论强调了随着未来工作的发展,职业兴趣将如何仍然是一个与职业指导、教育和组织高度相关的重要话题。
更新日期:2024-06-24
中文翻译:
未来的兴趣:自动化工作世界的综合审查和研究议程
由于技术变革扰乱了劳动力市场和教育途径,对自动化和未来工作的研究成为学者和从业者的主要关注点。尽管最近的文章发表了关于未来几年最有可能实现自动化的任务和工作类型的预测,但很少有人关注不同类型的职业兴趣如何容易受到自动化的影响,以及由此导致的人们之间的匹配的变化。兴趣和他们的工作。在本文中,我们对工作内部和跨工作的职业兴趣和自动化预测进行了综合审查。通过将预测标准化并映射到 Holland 的 RIASEC 兴趣模型,我们发现调查性(科学)和传统(注重细节)兴趣,包括 STEM 兴趣,最容易受到自动化的影响,而社会性(以人为本)和现实性(实践性)兴趣)利益最不受影响。对于艺术和企业兴趣来说,一些创造性工作、决策和领导技能可能会受到一系列工作自动化的影响。我们以这些预测为基础,提出一个整合兴趣、技术和职业的未来研究议程。具体来说,我们确定了未来研究的五个领域,包括利用有意的工作设计来增强兴趣、兴趣在与基于项目的工作相关的职业决策中的作用、自动化后人们兴趣的变化、基本兴趣的使用增加以及系统性影响自动化对不同人群的影响。总的来说,这篇评论强调了随着未来工作的发展,职业兴趣将如何仍然是一个与职业指导、教育和组织高度相关的重要话题。