Social psychological research has witnessed a burgeoning interest in advantaged group allies acting in solidarity with disadvantaged groups to challenge systems of inequality. While solidarity from advantaged group members is often deemed critical for social change, the perceptions of disadvantaged group members regarding ally participation are seldom addressed. This research delved into how LGBTQIA+ individuals in Denmark conceptualize allyship. Through 26 semi‐structured interviews with participants and organizers of queer pride events, a thematic analysis identified three themes addressing how allyship materializes, what risks it bears and who it involves. Specifically, we present a three‐levelled framework of allyship, which captures practices of allyship on a personal, relational and structural level. Our analysis also reveals the risk of allyship when it is not perceived as genuine and complexities of group boundaries when discussing allyship, shedding light on intersectional challenges within minority communities. These findings illustrate the nuances involved in providing and receiving allyship within and across various social (sub)groups.

中文翻译：

---

声援谁？少数族裔对丹麦酷儿空间中的盟友关系的看法


社会心理学研究见证了人们对优势群体盟友与弱势群体团结一致以挑战不平等制度的兴趣日益浓厚。虽然弱势群体成员的团结通常被认为对社会变革至关重要，但弱势群体成员对盟友参与的看法很少得到解决。这项研究深入探讨了丹麦的 LGBTQIA+ 个人如何概念化盟友关系。通过对酷儿骄傲活动的参与者和组织者进行 26 次半结构化访谈，主题分析确定了三个主题，解决了盟友关系如何实现、它承担的风险以及它涉及谁。具体来说，我们提出了一个三级盟友框架，它捕捉了个人、关系和结构层面的盟友实践。我们的分析还揭示了在讨论盟友关系时不被认为是真实的盟友关系的风险，以及群体界限的复杂性，揭示了少数族裔社区内部的交叉挑战。这些发现说明了在各种社会（子）群体内部和之间提供和接受盟友关系所涉及的细微差别。