This meta-analytic review is an update to the first meta-analysis of battering interventions () and includes 59 studies that evaluated treatment efficacy for domestically violent men and women. The outcome literature of controlled quasi-experimental and experimental studies was reviewed to test the relative impact of Duluth, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), and novel types of treatment on subsequent recidivism of violence. The first model examines studies comparing interventions to no treatment control conditions. The second model compares novel interventions to treatment as usual (i.e., the Duluth curriculum). Study design and type of treatment were tested as moderators in both models. Consistent with previous meta-analyses, effect sizes were in the small range, smaller in true experiments as compared to quasi-experimental designs when recidivism was based on partner or police reports. However, new experiments comparing novel treatments to the Duluth curriculum reveal effect sizes comparable to when comparing novel interventions to an untreated comparison group. Novel interventions, including and ce had the largest effect sizes when put head-to-head with Duluth control groups. Future research directions include testing moderators and mechanisms of change of the battering interventions that work. Implications for evidence-based practice in criminal justice include broader implementation and continued testing of these novel interventions with demonstrated efficacy in stopping intimate partner violence.

中文翻译：

---

哪些殴打干预措施有效？亲密伴侣暴力治疗结果研究的最新荟萃分析综述


这篇荟萃分析综述是对首次殴打干预措施荟萃分析的更新，其中包括 59 项评估家庭暴力男性和女性治疗效果的研究。回顾了受控准实验和实验研究的结果文献，以测试德卢斯、认知行为疗法（CBT）和新型治疗对随后暴力累犯的相对影响。第一个模型检查了干预措施与无治疗控制条件的比较研究。第二种模型将新颖的干预措施与常规治疗（即德卢斯课程）进行比较。研究设计和治疗类型在两个模型中都作为调节因素进行了测试。与之前的荟萃分析一致，当累犯基于伴侣或警方报告时，与准实验设计相比，真实实验中的效应大小范围较小，较小。然而，将新疗法与德卢斯课程进行比较的新实验揭示了与将新疗法与未经治疗的对照组进行比较时的效果大小相当。当与德卢斯对照组进行正面交锋时，新颖的干预措施（包括 和 ce）具有最大的效果。未来的研究方向包括测试有效的殴打干预措施的调节因素和改变机制。对刑事司法循证实践的影响包括更广泛地实施和持续测试这些新颖的干预措施，这些干预措施在制止亲密伴侣暴力方面已被证明有效。