Other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs) create opportunities for a wide range of area-based conservation strategies. As countries seek to integrate OECMs into conservation planning, it is useful to consider the types of areas that might meet the formal criteria. To support this goal, I analyzed the different types of measures discussed as possible OECMs in the literature, identifying a wide range of measures, far more diverse than those currently recognized as OECMs. There was a strong emphasis on measures with conservation as a secondary management objective, with most studies being supportive of the potential to balance biodiversity conservation and sustainable resource use. However, many studies have highlighted the need to ensure biodiversity outcomes are achieved and sustained, and that appropriate governance and management structures are in place. Concerns were raised about measures associated with resource extraction, such as fisheries and forestry, which were often considered incompatible with conservation. Very few studies offered a nuanced discussion of specific measures or evaluated whether sites offer conservation outcomes, leaving clear knowledge gaps in translating speculation into evidence. Nevertheless, the current literature offers a strong starting point from which to target potential case studies to build the evidence base necessary to advance OECMs.

中文翻译：

---

保护生物多样性的多种方法：讨论了不同的保护措施作为可能的其他有效的基于区域的保护措施


其他有效的区域保护措施（OECM）为广泛的区域保护战略创造了机会。当各国寻求将 OECM 纳入保护规划时，考虑可能符合正式标准的区域类型是有用的。为了支持这一目标，我分析了文献中讨论的可能的 OECM 的不同类型的措施，确定了一系列广泛的措施，比目前公认的 OECM 的措施更加多样化。人们非常重视将保护作为次要管理目标的措施，大多数研究都支持平衡生物多样性保护和可持续资源利用的潜力。然而，许多研究强调需要确保实现和维持生物多样性成果，并建立适当的治理和管理结构。人们对渔业和林业等资源开采相关措施表示担忧，这些措施往往被认为与保护不相容。很少有研究对具体措施进行细致入微的讨论，或评估遗址是否提供保护成果，在将猜测转化为证据方面留下了明显的知识差距。尽管如此，当前的文献提供了一个强有力的起点，可以以此为目标进行潜在的案例研究，以建立推进 OECM 所需的证据基础。