ObjectiveThis study aimed to explore the efficiency of different emotion regulation strategies, specifically reappraisal and suppression, in relation to adaptive and maladaptive personality profiles.BackgroundPersonality conditions emotions and influences emotion regulation. Of the available regulation strategies, reappraisal (reinterpreting the situation) is described as an efficient strategy, whereas suppression (not displaying the experienced emotion) carries higher physiological and cognitive costs. Little is known, however, about the influence of personality on these efficiencies.MethodWe tested the personality structure of 102 participants (Meanage = 20.75, SDage = 2.15), based on the Five‐Factor Model and the Maladaptive Personality Trait Model. Experience, expressivity, and physiological arousal were recorded during the viewing of emotionally charged positive and negative images while participants reappraised, suppressed, or viewed the images without regulating their emotions.ResultsWe identified two clusters for adaptive personality (“Adaptive Resilient” and “Anti‐resilient”) and two for maladaptive personality (“Maladaptive Resilient” and “Under‐controlled”). The major finding was for emotional experience in maladaptive personalities, where reappraisal was efficient in the Maladaptive Resilient profile, while none of the strategies brought relief in the Under‐controlled profile.ConclusionThis study, which systematically contrasts personality and efficiency of emotion regulation strategies, is one of the first attempts to refine the understanding of how personality influences the emotional regulation process.

中文翻译：

---

哪种情绪调节策略对谁有效？适应性和适应不良人格概况的重新评估和抑制效率


目的本研究旨在探讨不同情绪调节策略（特别是重评价和抑制）与适应性和适应不良人格特征的有效性。背景人格调节情绪并影响情绪调节。在可用的调节策略中，重新评估（重新解释情况）被描述为一种有效的策略，而抑制（不表现出所经历的情绪）会带来更高的生理和认知成本。然而，我们对人格对这些效率的影响知之甚少。方法我们测试了 102 名参与者的人格结构（平均年龄= 20.75，标清年龄= 2.15），基于五因素模型和适应不良人格特质模型。在观看充满情绪的积极和消极图像时，记录了经验、表现力和生理唤醒，同时参与者重新评估、抑制或观看图像而不调节自己的情绪。结果我们确定了适应性人格的两个集群（“适应性弹性”和“反适应性人格”）。弹性”）和两个适应不良人格（“适应不良弹性”和“控制不足”）。主要发现是针对适应不良人格的情绪体验，其中重新评估在适应不良弹性档案中是有效的，而没有任何策略可以在控制不足的档案中带来缓解。结论这项研究系统地对比了人格和情绪调节策略的效率，这是首次尝试完善对人格如何影响情绪调节过程的理解。