This article seeks to enhance the theoretical understanding of discrimination perception, especially in contexts with relevant statistical information. Previous research has provided important insights into the perception of single, ambiguous instances of discrimination. However, the generalizability of these insights to scenarios involving multiple, repeated instances of discrimination remains unclear. The current research aims to reduce this uncertainty by investigating whether three key determinants of discrimination perception in single instances – perpetrators' prototypicality, victims' control, and system‐justifying beliefs (SJB) – also influence observers' perceptions of repeated discrimination. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants perceived stronger discrimination when perpetrators were prejudiced members of the advantaged group. In Experiments 3 and 4, perceived discrimination intensified when victims had low control, a trend significantly noted in tabular presentations but not in sequential ones. In Experiments 5 and 6, a negative correlation between SJB and discrimination perception was observed. The theoretical and practical implications of these results, as well as open questions, are discussed. Overall, these studies advance our knowledge of discrimination perception in multiple instances. They highlight the intricate interplay between statistical data, moral judgements, and individual belief systems, paving the way for a more nuanced exploration of the underlying psychological processes of discrimination perception.

中文翻译：

---

事件之外：对多个歧视实例的看法的影响


本文旨在加强对歧视感知的理论理解，尤其是在具有相关统计信息的背景下。以前的研究为对单一、模棱两可的歧视实例的看法提供了重要的见解。然而，这些见解对涉及多个重复歧视实例的情景的普遍性仍不清楚。目前的研究旨在通过调查单个实例中歧视感知的三个关键决定因素——肇事者的原型性、受害者的控制和系统合理化信念 （SJB）——是否也会影响观察者对重复歧视的感知来减少这种不确定性。在实验 1 和 2 中，当肇事者是优势群体的偏见成员时，参与者会感受到更强的歧视。在实验 3 和 4 中，当受害者的控制能力低时，感知到的歧视会加剧，这一趋势在表格演示中显着注意到，但在顺序演示中则没有。在实验 5 和 6 中，观察到 SJB 与辨别感知之间存在负相关。讨论了这些结果的理论和实践意义，以及悬而未决的问题。总体而言，这些研究在多个实例中推进了我们对歧视感知的了解。它们强调了统计数据、道德判断和个人信仰体系之间错综复杂的相互作用，为更细致地探索歧视感知的潜在心理过程铺平了道路。