当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
International Studies Review
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Emotions in the Frontline. Notes on Interpretive Research in Conflict Areas
International Studies Review ( IF 3.1 ) Pub Date : 2024-05-14 , DOI: 10.1093/isr/viae025 Alessandro Tinti 1
International Studies Review ( IF 3.1 ) Pub Date : 2024-05-14 , DOI: 10.1093/isr/viae025 Alessandro Tinti 1
Affiliation
In line with the call for greater engagement with the affective and emotional dimensions of conducting research in conflict and post-conflict settings, this article addresses the methodological implications of incorporating emotionally sensed knowledge into the research process. It argues that emotions serve as fundamental heuristic keys for entering the field and acquiring situated knowledge. By reflecting upon practical challenges and ethical concerns encountered during field research in Iraq, the article aims to challenge disciplinary practices that promote emotional self-censorship and provide guidance to young researchers navigating the messy contingencies of fieldwork. The neglect of emotions in positivist approaches is examined in relation to the political economy of knowledge production, suggesting that prevailing emotional silence may lead to harmful research practices and threatens epistemological pluralism.
中文翻译:
前线的情感。冲突地区解释研究笔记
为了响应在冲突和冲突后环境中开展研究时更多地关注情感和情感维度的呼吁,本文讨论了将情感感知知识纳入研究过程的方法论含义。它认为情绪是进入该领域和获取情境知识的基本启发键。通过反思在伊拉克实地研究期间遇到的实际挑战和伦理问题,本文旨在挑战促进情感自我审查的学科实践,并为年轻研究人员应对实地工作中混乱的突发事件提供指导。实证主义方法中对情感的忽视与知识生产的政治经济学有关,表明普遍的情感沉默可能会导致有害的研究实践并威胁认识论的多元化。
更新日期:2024-05-14
中文翻译:
前线的情感。冲突地区解释研究笔记
为了响应在冲突和冲突后环境中开展研究时更多地关注情感和情感维度的呼吁,本文讨论了将情感感知知识纳入研究过程的方法论含义。它认为情绪是进入该领域和获取情境知识的基本启发键。通过反思在伊拉克实地研究期间遇到的实际挑战和伦理问题,本文旨在挑战促进情感自我审查的学科实践,并为年轻研究人员应对实地工作中混乱的突发事件提供指导。实证主义方法中对情感的忽视与知识生产的政治经济学有关,表明普遍的情感沉默可能会导致有害的研究实践并威胁认识论的多元化。