Over the last few years, Chile’s judicial system has witnessed a rise in criminal assumptions generated through social networks, under its hypotheses of funas, doxing, flagging or, in general, the exposure of the personal data of an individual, whether motivated by the performance of conduct of criminal relevance or simply of dubious morality or social appropriateness. Although these conducts originated as a form of digital social empowerment, they have turned into a criminal matter on their own right, posing a series of issues regarding the correct application of the law and casting doubt on the appropriate legal mechanisms to handle these types of accusations, as cases involving these kinds of conducts have been resolved both on a criminal and constitutional level. Thus, the purpose of this article is to determine whether the current Chilean national regulation provides sufficient tools that, with a reasonable interpretation, allow it to correctly handle these sorts of cases. Moreover, this article aims to, through a comprehensive analysis of Germany’s current legislation, determine whether Chile requires a new all-encompassing regulatory approach to these hypotheses similar to the German solution, or if the current rules provide a proper solution to the problem of public personal data exposure on social media as a dangerous behaviour for the person whose data is being exposed.

中文翻译：

---

根据刑法使用和滥用社交媒体作为惩罚性补救措施：工具还是法庭？智利法规分析

在过去的几年里，智利的司法系统见证了通过社交网络产生的犯罪假设的增加，其假设包括 funas、人肉搜索、标记或一般情况下的个人个人数据的暴露，无论是出于表演动机与犯罪相关的行为或仅仅是道德或社会适当性可疑的行为。尽管这些行为起源于数字社会赋权的一种形式，但它们本身已转变为刑事案件，引发了一系列有关法律正确适用的问题，并使人们对处理此类指控的适当法律机制产生怀疑，因为涉及此类行为的案件已在刑事和宪法层面得到解决。因此，本文的目的是确定智利现行国家法规是否提供了足够的工具，通过合理的解释，使其能够正确处理此类案件。此外，本文旨在通过对德国现行立法的全面分析，确定智利是否需要对这些假设采取类似于德国解决方案的新的全面监管方法，或者现行规则是否为公共问题提供了适当的解决方案。对于数据被暴露的人来说，在社交媒体上暴露个人数据是一种危险行为。