当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
The Yale Law Journal
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Rationalizing the Administrative Record for Equitable Constitutional Claims
The Yale Law Journal ( IF 5.2 ) Pub Date : 2024-04-30 Braden Currey
中文翻译:
合理化行政记录以实现公平的宪法主张
更新日期:2024-05-01
The Yale Law Journal ( IF 5.2 ) Pub Date : 2024-04-30 Braden Currey
The APA’s conventional rules stem from traditional rules of relevancy for discovery, rather than a statutory mandate. The scope of evidentiary review for constitutional claims against agencies should be determined by decision rules for a particular claim, consonant with the underlying principles of the scope of review in administrative litigation.
中文翻译:
合理化行政记录以实现公平的宪法主张
APA 的常规规则源于传统的发现相关性规则,而不是法定授权。对机关提出的宪法诉求的证据审查范围,应当根据具体诉求的判决规则来确定,并与行政诉讼审查范围的基本原则相一致。