当前位置: X-MOL 学术Kantian Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Individual Maxim Tokens, not Abstract Maxim Types
Kantian Review ( IF 1.1 ) Pub Date : 2024-04-22 , DOI: 10.1017/s1369415424000219
Samuel Kahn

I argue that Kant’s Categorical Imperative should be applied to individual maxim tokens rather than abstract maxim types. The article is divided into five sections. In the first, I explain my thesis. In the second, I show that my thesis disagrees with Rawls. In the third, I argue for my thesis on the basis of the wording of the Categorical Imperative and on the basis of considerations about autonomy. In the fourth, I argue for my thesis on the basis of considerations about the ‘ought implies can’ principle. In the fifth, I provide a summary of the main argumentative moves and also explain some of the philosophical advantages of my thesis.

中文翻译:

单独的 Maxim 令牌,而不是抽象的 Maxim 类型

我认为康德的绝对命令应该应用于个体格言标记而不是抽象格言类型。文章分为五个部分。首先,我解释一下我的论文。在第二部分中,我表明我的论文不同意罗尔斯。第三,我根据绝对命令的措辞和对自治的考虑来论证我的论文。第四,我基于对“应该意味着可以”原则的考虑来论证我的论点。在第五部分中,我总结了主要的论证动作,并解释了我的论文的一些哲学优点。
更新日期:2024-04-22
down
wechat
bug