BackgroundFor over three decades, digital technologies have been used in Implant Dentistry, beginning with the introduction of planning software for Static Computer‐Assisted Implant Surgery (S‐CAIS). During this time, this field has witnessed the emergence of diverse methodologies and a proliferation of technological advancements. Today, S‐CAIS is a widely adopted procedure for the placement of dental implants in both partially and fully edentulous patients, with Dynamic Computer‐Assisted Surgery (D‐CAIS) and Robotic‐Assisted Implant Surgery (RAIS) rapidly gaining attention among dental professionals. The continuous advancements in this arena are not merely indicative of technological progress; they represent a steadfast dedication to refining precision, enhancing efficiency, and fostering innovation with the goal of optimizing patient outcomes in dental implantology.AimsThe purpose of the following review is to meticulously examine the spectrum of digital technologies available and to describe their protocols, advantages, and shortcomings as well as to evaluate their accuracy in implant surgery in patients with complete edentulism.Materials and MethodsA scoping review was performed following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) protocols, leveraging the population, concept, and context (PCC) framework to construct the research question and determine the inclusion and exclusion criteria.ResultsTwo hundred and sixty‐seven records were identified for screening. After applying all the screening criteria, 41 articles were included for review and qualitative data analysis.DiscussionS‐CAIS, D‐CAIS, and RAIS were identified as the main technologies for computer assisted implant surgery. Their applications, characteristics, protocols and levels of accuracy were compared and described.ConclusionTaking into consideration the limitations of this study, S‐CAIS appears to be the most applied and validated technology in implant surgery for fully edentulous patients followed by D‐CAIS and RAIS being these last two promising initiatives in the field. Despite having similar levels of accuracy, the overall comparison showed a slightly higher values in RAIS followed by D‐CAIS and S‐CAIS.

中文翻译：

---

数字技术对全口无牙颌患者种植手术的影响：范围界定审查


背景三十多年来，从引入静态计算机辅助种植手术 (S-CAIS) 规划软件开始，数字技术已在种植牙科中得到应用。在此期间，该领域见证了多种方法的出现和技术进步的激增。如今，S-CAIS 已成为一种广泛采用的手术，用于在部分无牙颌和全口无牙颌患者中种植牙，其中动态计算机辅助手术 (D-CAIS) 和机器人辅助种植手术 (RAIS) 迅速受到牙科专业人士的关注。这一领域的不断进步不仅仅是技术进步的体现，也是技术进步的体现。它们代表着对提高精度、提高效率和促进创新的坚定奉献，以优化牙科种植学的患者结果为目标。目标以下审查的目的是仔细检查可用的数字技术的范围，并描述其协议、优势、材料和方法 根据 Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) 协议进行了范围界定审查，利用人口、概念和背景 (PCC) 框架来构建研究问题并确定纳入和排除标准。结果确定了 267 条记录进行筛选。应用所有筛选标准后，纳入 41 篇文章进行综述和定性数据分析。 讨论 S-CAIS、D-CAIS 和 RAIS 被确定为计算机辅助种植手术的主要技术。 对它们的应用、特点、方案和准确性水平进行了比较和描述。结论考虑到本研究的局限性，S-CAIS 似乎是全口无牙颌患者种植手术中应用最广泛和最有效的技术，其次是 D-CAIS 和 RAIS这是该领域最后两项有希望的举措。尽管准确度水平相似，但总体比较显示 RAIS 的值略高，其次是 D-CAIS 和 S-CAIS。