This paper raises four queries about Simester’s defective engagement with reason account of culpability found in his Fundamentals of Criminal Law: (1) the characterisation of the account in terms of moral ‘vices’; (2) the basis for identifying a vice as a ‘moral’ vice; (3) what is involved in an agent manifesting ‘insufficient care and concern’ for the interests of others; and (4) whether the account is an account of culpability generally, or is instead an account of criminal culpability, i.e., the type of culpability necessary for criminal conviction.

中文翻译：

---

罪责与道德缺陷

本文对西梅斯特在其《刑法基础》中对罪责的理性解释存在缺陷提出了四个疑问：（1）从道德“恶习”角度描述该解释； (2) 将一种恶习认定为“道德”恶习的依据； （三）代理人对他人利益“不够关心”的； （四）该罪责是否属于一般罪责罪责，或者是刑事罪责罪责，即刑事定罪所必需的罪责类型。