Extracorporeal Versus Conventional Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Propensity Score Matching Cohort Study.,Critical Care Medicine

当前位置： X-MOL 学术 › Crit. Care Med. › 论文详情

Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)

Extracorporeal Versus Conventional Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Propensity Score Matching Cohort Study.
Critical Care Medicine ( IF 7.7 ) Pub Date : 2024-03-05 , DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000006223
Yuan Bian _{1,

2,

3,

4,

5,

6} , Yuhui Pan _{1,

2,

3,

4,

5,

6} , Jiaqi Zheng _{1,

2,

3,

4,

5,

6} , Wen Zheng _{1,

2,

3,

4,

5,

6} , Lijie Qin ₅ , Guangju Zhou ₆ , Xifeng Sun _{1,

2,

3,

4,

5,

6} , Mingjie Wang _{1,

2,

3,

4,

5,

6} , Chunyi Wang _{1,

2,

3,

4,

5,

6} , Yuguo Chen _{1,

2,

3,

4,

5,

6} , Feng Xu _{1,

2,

3,

4,

5,

6}

Affiliation

Comparing the effects of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) and conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR) on outcomes in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) in China. The benefits of ECPR over CCPR in patients with IHCA remain controversial.

更新日期：2024-03-05

点击分享查看原文

点击收藏

阅读更多本刊最新论文本刊介绍/投稿指南

全部期刊列表>>