has helped as a pioneer in accepting Registered Reports (RRs), a submission format where authors provide the introduction, theory section, and methods of their paper for peer review data collection. Proud but never satisfied, we aim to further boost the number of suitable RR submissions due to our firm belief in their potential for fostering transparent, high-impact research. To inspire authors to explore diverse data collection strategies and methods beyond experiments and survey-based (replication) studies, this work presents four distinct but equally suitable research formats for RRs: meta-analyses, qualitative research, computational approaches, and field intervention studies. Expanding prior research that has explored and promoted general practices and methodological standards for RRs, we offer unique recommendations for preparing an adequate RR proposal along each of these four RR avenues. Additionally, we provide a table of summary resources for authors, reviewers, and editors looking to engage more with RR. In conclusion, we envision a future where other top-tier journals and funding agencies follow by embracing the incorporation of RRs as a critical component of their strategic approach.

中文翻译：

---

新的看待方式：您尚未考虑过注册报告的四种方式

作为接受注册报告（RR）的先驱，这是一种提交格式，作者提供论文的简介、理论部分和方法，以进行同行评审数据收集。我们自豪但永不满足，我们的目标是进一步增加合适的 RR 提交的数量，因为我们坚信它们在促进透明、高影响力研究方面的潜力。为了激励作者探索实验和基于调查（复制）研究之外的多种数据收集策略和方法，这项工作提出了四种不同但同样适合 RR 的研究格式：荟萃分析、定性研究、计算方法和现场干预研究。我们扩展了先前探索和促进 RR 一般实践和方法标准的研究，为沿着这四种 RR 途径准备适当的 RR 提案提供了独特的建议。此外，我们还为希望更多地参与 RR 的作者、审稿人和编辑提供了一个汇总资源表。总之，我们设想未来其他顶级期刊和资助机构也会效仿，将 RR 纳入其战略方法的关键组成部分。