This study compares the equality and equity of four shared micromobility models, including station-based bikesharing, hybrid e-bike sharing, hybrid e-scooter sharing, and dockless e-scooter sharing, with a case study in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Equality assessment is made using Lorenz curves and Gini coefficients, which reveals that hybrid and dockless models are relatively more equal than the station-based model. Equity assessment is conducted using regression analysis. Results on supply equity show that station-based and hybrid models are more equitable than the dockless model, as they allocate more devices to economically disadvantaged areas. Regarding utilization equity, regression models yield mixed results: depending on the disadvantaged indicators used to identify disadvantaged communities, both the station-based and hybrid/dockless models can exhibit characteristics of equity or inequity. Overall, our findings suggest that the hybrid model shows the most promising potential for improving both the equality and equity of the spatial distribution of shared micromobility services.

中文翻译：

---

共享微交通和公平性：基于车站、混合动力和无桩模式之间的比较

本研究通过明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯市的案例研究，比较了四种共享微出行模式的平等性和公平性，包括基于站点的自行车共享、混合动力电动自行车共享、混合动力电动滑板车共享和无桩电动滑板车共享。使用洛伦兹曲线和基尼系数进行平等评估，结果表明混合和无坞模式比基于站点的模式相对更平等。股权评估采用回归分析进行。供应公平性的结果表明，基于站点和混合模式比无坞模式更公平，因为它们将更多设备分配给经济贫困地区。关于利用公平性，回归模型产生的结果好坏参半：根据用于识别弱势社区的弱势指标，基于车站的模型和混合/无码头模型都可以表现出公平或不平等的特征。总体而言，我们的研究结果表明，混合模型显示出改善共享微交通服务空间分布的平等性和公平性的最有前途的潜力。