当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Research on Social Work Practice
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Mental Health Social Work Practitioner Research: A Narrative Review of Papers Published From One Academic Program
Research on Social Work Practice ( IF 1.7 ) Pub Date : 2024-02-12 , DOI: 10.1177/10497315241230667 Martin Webber 1 , Nicola Moran 1 , Ruth Naughton-Doe 1
Research on Social Work Practice ( IF 1.7 ) Pub Date : 2024-02-12 , DOI: 10.1177/10497315241230667 Martin Webber 1 , Nicola Moran 1 , Ruth Naughton-Doe 1
Affiliation
Purpose: This narrative review explores papers published in peer-reviewed journals reporting research from a practice research module of a qualifying program to examine their potential contribution to knowledge in mental health social work. Methods: A narrative review was undertaken according to the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews of papers published by the first three cohorts of a practice research module. Results: Eleven papers were included in the review which found, for example, some deficits in practitioners’ knowledge, confidence and understanding. The studies were modest and had some common limitations, but a high number of online views indicate that the papers have the potential to impact on practice. Conclusion: This review found that it is possible to use a practice research module of a qualifying program to train social workers to undertake and publish high-quality research which has the potential to influence policy or practice beyond a students’ own learning.
中文翻译:
心理健康社会工作从业者研究:对一个学术项目发表的论文的叙述性评论
目的:这篇叙述性评论探讨了在同行评审期刊上发表的论文,这些论文报告了资格计划的实践研究模块的研究,以检验它们对心理健康社会工作知识的潜在贡献。方法:根据 PRISMA 扩展对实践研究模块的前三组发表的论文进行范围界定审查,进行叙述性审查。结果:审查中纳入了 11 篇论文,发现从业者的知识、信心和理解方面存在一些缺陷。这些研究规模不大,并且存在一些共同的局限性,但大量的在线观点表明这些论文有可能对实践产生影响。结论:本次审查发现,可以使用资格计划的实践研究模块来培训社会工作者进行和发表高质量的研究,这些研究有可能影响学生自己学习之外的政策或实践。
更新日期:2024-02-12
中文翻译:
心理健康社会工作从业者研究:对一个学术项目发表的论文的叙述性评论
目的:这篇叙述性评论探讨了在同行评审期刊上发表的论文,这些论文报告了资格计划的实践研究模块的研究,以检验它们对心理健康社会工作知识的潜在贡献。方法:根据 PRISMA 扩展对实践研究模块的前三组发表的论文进行范围界定审查,进行叙述性审查。结果:审查中纳入了 11 篇论文,发现从业者的知识、信心和理解方面存在一些缺陷。这些研究规模不大,并且存在一些共同的局限性,但大量的在线观点表明这些论文有可能对实践产生影响。结论:本次审查发现,可以使用资格计划的实践研究模块来培训社会工作者进行和发表高质量的研究,这些研究有可能影响学生自己学习之外的政策或实践。