A key ambition in care studies has been to study care in practice and as practice. By turning towards practices, care studies has rendered visible and acknowledged important work that is not captured through looking at formal procedures or official and written materials, such as policy documents and medical protocols. In this literature, document materials and the written have often been seen as unable to demonstrate and address the ‘specificities of care’ (Mol et al., 2010, p. 9). We challenge this view by showing how pragmatically-oriented approaches can be extended to the procedural and formalized aspects of care practices. We draw upon fieldwork in the life sciences—comparative immunology—investigated through experiments on Atlantic cod ( Gadus Morhua). How to care for fish is a contested domain; many uncertainties exist around how to care for fish so that legal requirements are met. We ask: How are existing legal and ethical principles and procedures put to work in cod immunology and animal research? By what document-practices and document-tools is care for cod in research negotiated and settled? How does the cod stand out as an object of care in the life sciences? Our article answers these questions by empirically teasing out how scientists navigate the terrain and arguing for the importance of bringing the document-based realities of animal research into analysis. We do this by delineating three different versions of care: procedural care, skilled care, and dispassionate care.

中文翻译：

---

用 care 和 cod 进行实验：关于文件实践、care 和 fish 作为新实验动物的版本


护理研究的一个关键目标是在实践中和作为实践来研究护理。通过转向实践，护理研究使重要的工作变得可见和得到认可，而这些工作不是通过查看正式程序或官方和书面材料（如政策文件和医疗协议）来捕捉的。在这些文献中，文件材料和书面材料通常被视为无法展示和解决“护理的特殊性”（Mol 等人，2010 年，第 9 页）。我们通过展示如何将以实用为导向的方法扩展到护理实践的程序化和正式化方面来挑战这一观点。我们借鉴了生命科学中的实地工作——比较免疫学——通过对大西洋鳕鱼 （Gadus Morhua） 的实验进行研究。如何照顾鱼是一个有争议的领域;围绕如何照顾鱼类以满足法律要求，存在许多不确定性。我们问：现有的法律和道德原则和程序如何在鳕鱼免疫学和动物研究中发挥作用？通过哪些文件实践和文件工具来协商和解决研究中对鳕鱼的照顾？鳕鱼如何成为生命科学领域的护理对象？我们的文章通过实证梳理科学家如何驾驭地形，并论证将基于文献的动物研究现实纳入分析的重要性来回答这些问题。我们通过描述三种不同版本的护理来做到这一点：程序护理、熟练护理和冷静护理。