背景
虽然环境因素在减肥效果中发挥着重要作用,但遗传因素也可能影响减肥的成功。我们检查了 BMI 的全基因组多基因评分是否与减肥效果相关,旨在识别与减肥相关的常见遗传变异。
方法
ONTIME 研究的参与者( n = 1210)遵循统一的多模式行为减肥干预措施。我们首先测试了较高 BMI 的全基因组多基因评分与减肥效果(总体重减轻、体重减轻率和减重)之间的关联。然后,我们在 ONTIME 研究中进行了减肥全基因组关联研究 (GWAS),并与早期研究进行了最大的减肥荟萃分析 ( n = 3056)。最后,我们在 ONTIME 研究中对其他减肥结果和相关因素进行了探索性 GWAS。
结果
我们发现,多基因评分中的每个标准差增量都与体重减轻率的降低相关(95% CI)= -0.04(-0.06,-0.01; P = 3.7×10 -03 )并且与更高的损耗相关按治疗持续时间调整后。在之前的 GWAS 减肥研究荟萃分析中,没有发现任何关联达到全基因组显着性。然而,ONTIME 研究中的关联显示的效果与已发表的 rs545936 ( MIR486/NKX6.3/ANK1 )(先前提到的减肥位点)的研究一致。在荟萃分析中,次要 A 等位基因的每个拷贝与治疗第五周时 0.12 (0.03) kg/m 2较高的 BMI 相关 ( P = 3.9 × 10 -06 )。在ONTIME研究中,我们还在与脂肪分解、体重和代谢调节有关的基因附近鉴定了两个全基因组显着的( P < 5×10 -08 )体重减轻率位点: NFIP1 / SPRY4 / FGF1附近的rs146905606;和LSAMP附近的 rs151313458 。
结论
我们的研究结果预计将有助于开发基于遗传学的个性化减肥方法。
临床试验注册
肥胖、营养遗传学、时机和地中海(ONTIME;clinicaltrials.gov:NCT02829619)研究。
"点击查看英文标题和摘要"
Impact of polygenic score for BMI on weight loss effectiveness and genome-wide association analysis
Background
While environmental factors play an important role in weight loss effectiveness, genetics may also influence its success. We examined whether a genome-wide polygenic score for BMI was associated with weight loss effectiveness and aimed to identify common genetic variants associated with weight loss.
Methods
Participants in the ONTIME study (n = 1210) followed a uniform, multimodal behavioral weight-loss intervention. We first tested associations between a genome-wide polygenic score for higher BMI and weight loss effectiveness (total weight loss, rate of weight loss, and attrition). We then conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) for weight loss in the ONTIME study and performed the largest weight loss meta-analysis with earlier studies (n = 3056). Lastly, we ran exploratory GWAS in the ONTIME study for other weight loss outcomes and related factors.
Results
We found that each standard deviation increment in the polygenic score was associated with a decrease in the rate of weight loss Beta (95% CI) = −0.04 (−0.06, −0.01; P = 3.7×10−03) and with higher attrition after adjusting by treatment duration. No associations reached genome-wide significance in meta-analysis with previous GWAS studies for weight loss. However, associations in the ONTIME study showed effects consistent with published studies for rs545936 (MIR486/NKX6.3/ANK1), a previously noted weight loss locus. In the meta-analysis, each copy of the minor A allele was associated with 0.12 (0.03) kg/m2 higher BMI at week five of treatment (P = 3.9 × 10−06). In the ONTIME study, we also identified two genome-wide significant (P < 5×10−08) loci for the rate of weight loss near genes implicated in lipolysis, body weight, and metabolic regulation: rs146905606 near NFIP1/SPRY4/FGF1; and rs151313458 near LSAMP.
Conclusion
Our findings are expected to help in developing personalized weight loss approaches based on genetics.
Clinical trial registration
Obesity, Nutrigenetics, Timing, and Mediterranean (ONTIME; clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02829619) study.