Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment ( IF 6.0 ) Pub Date : 2024-01-19 , DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2024.108895 Matthias J. Böldt , Hendrik P.J. Smit , Ralf Loges , Friedhelm Taube , Christof Kluß , Thorsten Reinsch
The integration of cover crops (CCs) in low-input systems is a widely adopted practice to re-capture surplus nitrogen (N) and avoid excessive losses to the environment by leaching or N2O emissions. Closing the N cycle within an agricultural system is therefore economically beneficial and lowers the negative impact of inorganic N on soil and water bodies. However, it is debated if pollution swapping occurs to some extent and if N2O emissions increases as a result of decreased N leaching. An experiment was conducted to systematically evaluate grass vs. non-grass CCs, frost tolerant vs. non-frost tolerant CCs as well as high residual N vs. low residual N from the pre-crop, in a low input system which receives no additional fertilizer. Furthermore, the extent to which N2O losses occur from different seeded CC species and mixtures (Sinapis alba/Vicia sativa, Brassica rapa/Vicia villosa and Lolium perenne/Trifolium repens) was investigated over two experimental years on a sandy soil located in northern Germany. The annual N2O emissions were investigated on a weekly basis using the static closed chamber method. The non-grass CCs had the highest annual N2O emissions (2.5 kg N2O-N ha−1) compared to grass (1.9 kg N2O-N ha−1). The frost-killed CC led to higher N2O emissions (3.3 kg N2O-N ha−1), especially after the first year when high residual N was still present due to the pre-crop. This indicates that the type of CC used, frost tolerance as well as residual N from the pre-crop will affect N2O emissions. The low N2O emissions observed in the current study indicate that pollution swapping as a result of avoided N leached due to the use of CCs, as shown in a previous paper from the same experiment, is not occurring under these low-input systems. Furthermore, grass used as CC has low N2O emissions and a high N uptake and therefore the potential to close the N cycle and improve on-farm N budgets.
中文翻译:
评估冬季使用不同覆盖作物策略的低投入系统中的一氧化二氮排放量
将覆盖作物 (CC) 纳入低投入系统是一种广泛采用的做法,用于重新捕获多余的氮 (N),并避免因淋滤或 N 2 O 排放而对环境造成过度损失。因此,在农业系统内关闭氮循环具有经济效益,并减少无机氮对土壤和水体的负面影响。然而,污染交换是否发生一定程度以及N 2 O排放量是否因氮淋滤减少而增加仍存在争议。进行了一项实验,以系统地评估草与非草 CC、耐霜与不耐霜 CC 以及预作中的高残留氮与低残留氮,在不接受额外的低投入系统中肥料。此外,在位于北部的沙质土壤上进行了两年的实验,研究了不同种子 CC 物种和混合物(白芥子/蚕豆、白菜/野豌豆和黑麦草/白三叶草)发生 N 2 O 损失的程度。德国。采用静态密闭室法每周调查年度 N 2 O 排放量。与草(1.9 kg N 2 O-N ha -1)相比,非草CC的年N 2 O排放量最高(2.5 kg N 2 O-N ha -1)。霜冻CC导致更高的N 2 O排放(3.3 kg N 2 O-N ha -1),特别是在第一年之后,由于作物前期,仍然存在高残留氮。这表明所使用的CC 类型、抗冻性以及前茬作物中残留的N 都会影响N 2 O 排放。当前研究中观察到的低 N 2 O 排放表明,在这些低投入系统下,由于使用 CC 避免了 N 浸出而导致的污染交换(如同一实验的先前论文所示)并未发生。此外,用作 CC 的草具有较低的 N 2 O 排放量和较高的氮吸收量,因此具有闭合氮循环和改善农场氮预算的潜力。