As the Supreme Court has sought to ground more of its constitutional jurisprudence in original understanding, it has signaled an interest in revisiting aspects of Employment Division v. Smith. This Essay assesses potential replacement doctrines and defends a historically grounded version of strict scrutiny that does not require judicial balancing.

 

中文翻译：

---

取代史密斯

由于最高法院试图将其宪法判例更多地建立在原始理解的基础上，它已表示有兴趣重新审视就业司诉史密斯一案的各个方面。本文评估了潜在的替代学说，并捍卫了一种有历史依据的严格审查版本，不需要司法平衡。