In the current study, the structural and external validity of data derived from two shorter versions of the Multidimensional Assessment of Teamwork in Sport (MATS) were examined using multilevel analyses. Evidence of model-data fit was shown for both a 5-factor model comprising 19 items (with subscales assessing teamwork preparation, execution, evaluation, adjustments, and management of team maintenance) and a single-factor model comprising five items (providing a global estimate of teamwork). In general, data from both versions were positively and significantly correlated with (and distinct from) athletes' perceptions of team cohesion, collective efficacy, performance satisfaction, enjoyment in their sport, and commitment to their team and their coaches' transformational leadership. The measures appear well suited to detect between-teams differences, as evidenced by intraclass correlation coefficients and acceptable reliability estimates of team-level scores. In summary, the 19-item Multidimensional Assessment of Teamwork in Sport-Short and five-item Multidimensional Assessment of Teamwork in Sport-Global provide conceptually and psychometrically sound questionnaires to briefly measure teamwork in sport.

中文翻译：

---

体育运动中团队合作的两种简短测量方法的心理测量特性。


在当前的研究中，使用多层次分析检查了从两个较短版本的体育团队合作多维评估（MATS）中获得的数据的结构和外部有效性。包含 19 个项目的 5 因素模型（评估团队准备、执行、评估、调整和团队维护管理的子量表）和包含 5 个项目的单因素模型（提供全球团队合作的估计）。总的来说，两个版本的数据都与运动员对团队凝聚力、集体效能、表现满意度、运动乐趣以及对团队和教练变革领导力的承诺的看法呈正相关且显着相关（且不同）。这些措施似乎非常适合检测团队之间的差异，组内相关系数和团队级别分数的可接受的可靠性估计就证明了这一点。总之，《体育团队合作的 19 项多维评估》和《全球体育团队合作的 5 项多维评估》提供了概念上和心理测量上合理的调查问卷，以简要衡量体育中的团队合作。