当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Good for you, bad for me? The daily dynamics of perspective taking and well-being in coworker dyads.
Journal of Occupational Health Psychology ( IF 5.9 ) Pub Date : 2023-11-13 , DOI: 10.1037/ocp0000367 Ulrike Fasbender 1 , Wladislaw Rivkin 2 , Fabiola H Gerpott 3
Journal of Occupational Health Psychology ( IF 5.9 ) Pub Date : 2023-11-13 , DOI: 10.1037/ocp0000367 Ulrike Fasbender 1 , Wladislaw Rivkin 2 , Fabiola H Gerpott 3
Affiliation
Perspective taking is encouraged by organizations as a form of supporting coworkers. Yet, its impact on employees' and coworkers' well-being is not well understood. We, therefore, take a dyadic approach to understand the daily dynamics of employees' perspective taking, its benefits for coworkers, and its costs for employees themselves. Specifically, we draw from self-regulation theory to examine the double-edged sword of perspective taking for one's own and one's coworker's well-being (reflected by subjective vitality). With regard to coworker well-being, we take an other-oriented resource lens and theorize that the focal employee's perspective taking increases the coworker's received support and well-being. With regard to the focal employee's well-being, we take a self-oriented resource lens and theorize that perspective taking increases the focal employee's self-regulatory resource depletion, which impairs their well-being. We examined our research model in a dyadic experience sampling study with three daily measurement occasions over 2 working weeks in a sample of 89 coworker dyads (178 individuals). Multilevel analyses showed that perspective taking had a positive indirect effect on coworker well-being via received coworker support, while it had a negative indirect effect on the focal employee's well-being via self-regulatory resource depletion. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
中文翻译:
对你好,对我坏?同事二人组中观点采择和幸福感的日常动态。
组织鼓励采取观点作为支持同事的一种形式。然而,它对员工和同事福祉的影响尚不清楚。因此,我们采用二元方法来了解员工观点采择的日常动态、其为同事带来的好处以及员工自身的成本。具体来说,我们借鉴自我调节理论来检验观点采择对于自己和同事的福祉(反映在主观活力上)的双刃剑。关于同事的幸福感,我们采用以他人为导向的资源视角,并推测焦点员工的观点采择会增加同事获得的支持和幸福感。关于焦点员工的福祉,我们采用自我导向的资源视角,并推测观点采择会增加焦点员工的自我调节资源消耗,从而损害他们的福祉。我们通过二元经验抽样研究检验了我们的研究模型,在 2 个工作周内每天进行 3 次测量,样本包括 89 名同事(178 人)。多层次分析表明,观点采择通过获得同事的支持对同事的幸福感产生积极的间接影响,而通过自我调节资源耗尽对焦点员工的幸福感产生负面的间接影响。 (PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
更新日期:2023-11-13
中文翻译:
对你好,对我坏?同事二人组中观点采择和幸福感的日常动态。
组织鼓励采取观点作为支持同事的一种形式。然而,它对员工和同事福祉的影响尚不清楚。因此,我们采用二元方法来了解员工观点采择的日常动态、其为同事带来的好处以及员工自身的成本。具体来说,我们借鉴自我调节理论来检验观点采择对于自己和同事的福祉(反映在主观活力上)的双刃剑。关于同事的幸福感,我们采用以他人为导向的资源视角,并推测焦点员工的观点采择会增加同事获得的支持和幸福感。关于焦点员工的福祉,我们采用自我导向的资源视角,并推测观点采择会增加焦点员工的自我调节资源消耗,从而损害他们的福祉。我们通过二元经验抽样研究检验了我们的研究模型,在 2 个工作周内每天进行 3 次测量,样本包括 89 名同事(178 人)。多层次分析表明,观点采择通过获得同事的支持对同事的幸福感产生积极的间接影响,而通过自我调节资源耗尽对焦点员工的幸福感产生负面的间接影响。 (PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。