Reports the retraction of "Crying as communication in psychotherapy: The influence of client and therapist attachment dimensions and client attachment to therapist on amount and type of crying" by Noah Robinson, Clara E. Hill and Dennis M. Kivlighan Jr. (Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2015[Jul], Vol 62[3], 379-392). The following article is being retracted (https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000090). This retraction is at the request of coauthors Kivlighan and Hill after the results of an investigation by the University of Maryland Institutional Review Board (IRB). The IRB found that the study included data from between one and four therapy clients of the Maryland Psychotherapy Clinic and Research Laboratory (MPCRL) who either had not been asked to provide consent or had withdrawn consent for their data to be included in the research. Robinson was not responsible for obtaining and verifying participant consent but agreed to the retraction of this article. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2015-23479-001.) Nelson (2005) associated 3 types of crying (inhibited, protest, despair) with 3 dimensions of attachment (avoidant, anxious, and secure). To test this theory, trained judges rated the intensity of inhibition, protest, and despair in 347 crying episodes for 40 clients and 14 therapists in 1,074 psychotherapy sessions. Crying occurred once out of every 7 sessions, and usually was characterized by protest or inhibition. Pre-therapy attachment dimensions of both therapist and client influenced crying. Therapists with high attachment avoidance had clients who cried frequently but less over time, whereas therapists with high attachment anxiety had clients who cried with more protest over time. Clients with high attachment anxiety initially cried with more protest and inhibition, but decreased over time, whereas clients with low attachment anxiety increased protest over time. Throughout the course of psychotherapy, therapists who were seen by their clients as establishing a secure attachment elicited more overall crying and a higher intensity of protest, whereas therapists who were seen by their clients as establishing insecure attachments had clients who cried less. Clients who established a secure or avoidant relationship with their therapists, relative to other clients of that therapist, cried infrequently and with inhibition, whereas clients who established a preoccupied relationship cried relatively often. Changes are suggested for Nelson's (2005) typology. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

罗宾逊等人的撤回。 （2015）。


报告撤回了诺亚·罗宾逊 (Noah Robinson)、克拉拉·E·希尔 (Clara E. Hill) 和丹尼斯·M·基夫利汉 (Dennis M. Kivlighan Jr.) 撰写的《心理治疗中的哭泣作为沟通：来访者和治疗师依恋维度以及来访者对治疗师的依恋对哭泣量和类型的影响》（《咨询杂志》心理学，2015年[7月]，第62卷[3]，379-392）。以下文章已被撤回 (https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000090)。此次撤回是应合著者 Kivlighan 和 Hill 在马里兰大学机构审查委员会 (IRB) 调查结果出来后的要求。 IRB 发现，该研究包含来自马里兰州心理治疗诊所和研究实验室 (MPCRL) 的一到四名治疗客户的数据，这些客户要么没有被要求提供同意，要么已经撤回了将其数据纳入研究的同意。罗宾逊不负责获取和核实参与者的同意，但同意撤回本文。 （以下原始文章摘要出现在记录 2015-23479-001 中。）Nelson (2005) 将 3 种类型的哭泣（抑制、抗议、绝望）与 3 个维度的依恋（回避、焦虑和安全）联系起来。为了检验这一理论，训练有素的法官对 40 名客户和 14 名治疗师在 1,074 次心理治疗中的 347 次哭泣事件中的抑制、抗议和绝望的强度进行了评估。每 7 个疗程中就会出现一次哭泣，通常表现为抗议或抑制。治疗前治疗师和来访者的依恋维度都会影响哭泣。具有高度依恋回避的治疗师的客户经常哭泣，但随着时间的推移，哭泣次数会减少，而具有高度依恋焦虑的治疗师的客户随着时间的推移会哭得更多，并抗议。 依恋焦虑高的来访者最初会因更多的抗议和抑制而哭泣，但随着时间的推移而减少，而依恋焦虑低的来访者随着时间的推移会增加抗议。在整个心理治疗过程中，被来访者视为建立了安全依恋的治疗师会引起更多的整体哭泣和更高强度的抗议，而被来访者视为建立了不安全依恋的治疗师则导致来访者哭泣较少。相对于该治疗师的其他来访者，与治疗师建立了安全或回避关系的来访者很少哭泣，并且会抑制哭泣，而与治疗师建立全神贯注关系的来访者则相对经常哭泣。建议对 Nelson (2005) 的类型进行更改。 （PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2023 APA，保留所有权利）。