地膜覆盖和施氮肥是干旱和半干旱地区雨养农业提高作物产量的两种重要田间管理措施。然而,这两种做法可能会对土壤有机碳 (SOC) 储量和周转产生相反的影响。为了阐明和分析这些措施的综合效果,我们进行了为期7年的玉米连作试验,共进行了四种处理:(1)不覆盖地膜不施氮肥(对照),(2)覆盖地膜不施氮肥(PFM) ),(3)不覆膜施氮(N),(4)覆膜施氮(PFM+N)。在 C 3 到 C 后,使用轻有机碳和重有机碳(LFOC 和 HFOC)中的 13 C自然丰度来区分土壤中的“旧”(> 7 年)和“新”(< 7 年)C 4.植被变化。PFM 在 7 年内提高了土壤温度和水分含量,使玉米地上部和根部生物量分别增加了 150% 和 108%。PFM 下的湿热条件加速了不稳定 C(即 LFOC)和持久性 C(即 HFOC)的分解(通过土壤中CO 2流出量测量)。由于“旧”C 的快速分解和“新”C 的稳定不足,PFM 减少了 LFOC 和 HFOC 池。此外,PFM 比 LFOC 更大程度地加速了 HFOC 分解。在存在和不存在 PFM 的情况下,SOC 分解的Q 10值保持相似。施氮肥使玉米地上部和根部生物量分别增加了54%和40%。在对照土壤中,由于矿质氮的利用率有限且缺乏肥料氮的补充,微生物分解了有机氮。因此,施氮肥下 LFOC 含量的增加主要归因于“旧”土壤分解的减少。 C.施氮肥产生了与对照土壤相似的HFOC含量,同时也加速了“旧”C的分解,促进了“新”C的稳定,从而导致更快的周转速度。因此,由于对 LFOC 和 HFOC 的影响相反,施氮肥对 SOC 周转的影响可以忽略不计。施用氮肥导致Q 10减少值与对照相比。PFM与施氮肥的结合加速了HFOC和SOC的分解,但对SOC、不稳定碳和持久碳含量没有影响。这表明 7 年的时间还不足以触发 PFM 与 SOC 和 HFOC 含量施氮结合的反应。总之,PFM 通过加速 LFOC 和 HFOC 的分解导致 SOC 含量下降。相反,施氮肥通过抑制LFOC分解和增强HFOC分解来维持SOC含量。
"点击查看英文标题和摘要"
Contrasting impacts of plastic film mulching and nitrogen fertilization on soil organic matter turnover
Plastic film mulching and nitrogen (N) fertilization are two important field management practices used to increase crop yields in rain-fed agriculture in arid and semi-arid areas. These two practices, however, can have opposing effects on soil organic carbon (SOC) stock and turnover. To clarify and analyze the combined effects of these practices, we conducted a 7-year continuous maize cultivation experiment with four treatments: (1) no plastic film mulching without N fertilization (Control), (2) plastic film mulching without N fertilization (PFM), (3) N fertilization without plastic film mulching (N), and (4) plastic film mulching with N fertilization (PFM + N). The 13C natural abundance of in the light and heavy fractions of organic carbon (LFOC and HFOC) was used to differentiate “old” (>7 years) and “new” (<7 years) C in the soil after C3 to C4 vegetation change. PFM increased soil temperature and moisture content over 7 years and led to a 150 % and 108 % increase in the above-ground and root biomass of maize, respectively. Hot and wet conditions under PFM accelerated the decomposition of both labile C (i.e., LFOC) and persistent C (i.e., HFOC), as measured by CO2 efflux from the soil. PFM decreased the LFOC and HFOC pools due to the fast decomposition of “old” C and inadequate stabilization of “new” C. Furthermore, PFM accelerated HFOC decomposition to a greater extent than that of LFOC. The Q10 values of SOC decomposition remained similar both in the presence and absence of PFM. Nitrogen fertilization increased the aboveground and root biomass of maize by 54 % and 40 %, respectively. In the control soil, microorganisms decomposed organic N owing to limited availability of mineral N and in the absence of any from replenishment by fertilizer N. Thus, the increase in LFOC content under N fertilization, was primarily attributed to the reduced decomposition of “old” C. The use of N fertilization produced a similar HFOC content as that of the control soil, while also accelerating the decomposition of “old” C and promoting the stabilization of “new” C, resulting in a faster turnover rate. Consequently, the impact of N fertilization on SOC turnover was negligible owing to the contrasting effects on LFOC and HFOC. The application of N fertilization resulted in a reduction of the Q10 value as compared to control. The combination of PFM and N fertilization accelerated the decomposition of HFOC and SOC, while having absent effect on SOC, labile C and persistent C contents. This indicates that 7 years weren’t long enough to trigger a response to the combination of PFM and N fertilization from SOC and HFOC contents. In summary, PFM led to a decline in the SOC content by accelerating the decomposition of both LFOC and HFOC. Conversely, N fertilization maintained SOC content by inhibiting LFOC decomposition and enhancing HFOC decomposition.