To believe that logic has no history might at first seem peculiar today. But since the early 20th century, this position has been repeatedly conflated with logical monism of Kantian provenance. This logical monism asserts that only one logic is authoritative, thereby rendering all other research in the field marginal and negating the possibility of acknowledging a history of logic. In this paper, I will show how this and many related issues have developed, and that they are founded on only one prominent statement by Kant. I will argue, however, that this statement takes on a very different meaning in a broader context of the history and philosophy of science, and that Kant and his supporters never advocated the logical monism that they are still said to hold today.

今天，相信逻辑没有历史乍一看似乎很奇怪。但自20世纪初以来，这一立场一再与源自康德的逻辑一元论混为一谈。这种逻辑一元论断言只有一种逻辑是权威的，从而使该领域的所有其他研究都处于边缘地位，并否定了承认逻辑历史的可能性。在本文中，我将展示这个问题以及许多相关问题是如何发展的，并且它们仅建立在康德的一个重要陈述之上。然而，我认为，这种说法在科学史和科学哲学的更广泛背景下具有非常不同的含义，并且康德和他的支持者从未提倡他们今天仍然坚持的逻辑一元论。